WRIT PETITION NO.1940 OF 1999
23 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "1982"
3196 result(s) found
Found 3196 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Retired Head Master's Petition for Pension and Benefits Despite Post-Retirement Disciplinary Inquiry. Disciplinary Inquiry Initiated After Superannuation Without Statutory Authority is Invalid and Pension Cannot Be Withheld.
15 Mar 2024The petitioner, Ashok Ramrao Kadam, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 9 August 1984 and later promoted as Head Master. He served until his supe...
- 73
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Violation of Section 3(2) Proviso — Initial Detention Cannot Exceed Six Months. The court held that the proviso to Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act mandates an initial detention period of only six months, and a 12-month initial order is illegal.
3 Apr 2023The petitioner, Himanshu Roy, challenged a detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, on 30 July 2022, confirmed by the State of Ma...
- 130
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Retired University Employees' Writ Petitions for Pension Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. University employees who retired before adoption of Defined Contribution Pension Scheme are entitled to pension as per pre-amendment rules.
10 Mar 2022The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by retired employees of Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agriculture University, Parbhani, seeking pensionary...
- 66
High Court
Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint in Property Suit as Barred by Limitation — Failure to Disclose Cause of Action Within Three Years of Knowledge of Alleged Fraud Leads to Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC. The court held that the plaintiff's knowledge of the alleged fraud in 2015 or earlier triggered the limitation period under Article 58 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the suit filed in 2021 was beyond the prescribed period.
18 Jul 2022The plaintiff, Ramesh Mali, filed a suit seeking declaration and injunction in respect of certain properties originally owned by his deceased father, ...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Caveat in Execution Proceedings — Caveat Under Section 148A CPC Not Maintainable After Execution Application Is Filed. Court Holds That Assignee Decree-Holder Can Execute Decree Without Notice to Judgment-Debtor Under Order 21 Rule 16 CPC.
2 Dec 2021The petitioners, who are judgment-debtors in a pending execution application, filed a caveat under Section 148A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (...
- 100
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Land Dispute Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review petition under Section 114 r/w Order 47 Rule 1 CPC dismissed as petitioners failed to establish any error apparent on the face of the record in the judgment dated 23.04.2021 in W.A. No. 898/1993.
7 Jan 2025The case involves a review petition filed by the legal representatives of the original appellant (since deceased) against a judgment dated 23.04.2021 ...
- 81
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Directs Implementation of Emblems and Names Act and Rules to Prevent Improper Use of National Symbols on Vehicles and Goods. The court issued a writ of mandamus to enforce the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950 and related rules, holding that national symbols represent sovereignty and dignity and must be protected from misuse.
4 Apr 2025The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, in a public interest litigation filed by the High Court Legal Services Committee, addressed the issue of imp...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Ex-Serviceman's Petition Against Cancellation of Surplus Land Allotment - Violation of Natural Justice and Limitation. The court set aside the cancellation order passed after 8 years without notice, restoring the allotment of three acres of surplus land to the petitioner.
2 Mar 2010The petitioner, an ex-serviceman, was allotted three acres of surplus land out of Gut No. 19A at village Sangvi (Karadkhed) in Degloor Tahsil in the y...
- 57
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Workmen's Appeal in Industrial Closure Dispute — Upholds Validity of Closure and Rejection of Retrenchment Compensation Claims. Workmen's claim for retrenchment compensation under Section 25FFF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 fails as closure was valid and workmen had already accepted dues.
24 Jun 2010The case involves two appeals arising from a common order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No. 3146 of 2004. The ba...
- 91
