Search Results for "settlement stay"

1119 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1119 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Related Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148, 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The judgment arises from a criminal appeal against conviction for murder and related offences. The appellants, original accused Nos.1-3, 5, and 6, wer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband and Father-in-law in Dowry Death Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Specific Allegations. Conviction under Sections 498-A and 304-B IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand of Dowry and Cruelty Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Pravin Babanrao Yawle (husband) and Babanrao Govindrao Yawle (father-in-law) for offences under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes CBI Charge Sheets Against Cooperative Society Chairman for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Chairman of cooperative society held to be a public servant under Section 21 IPC, requiring prior sanction before prosecution.

The petitioners, M/s. Ghataprabha Sahakari Sakkare Karkhane Niyamit (a cooperative society) and its Chairman, Lakhan Laxmanrao Jarkiholi, filed two wr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove homicidal death and chain of circumstances was incomplete.

The appellant, Rajkumar Bhurelal Choudhary, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Gondia, for the murder of his wife, Bhumabai @ Ranjita, under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.

The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...