Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Petitioner in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Absence of Legally Enforceable Debt. The court held that the essential ingredient of a legally enforceable debt or liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was missing, and therefore the FIR was liable to be quashed.
8 Sep 2005The petitioner, Ms. Khushi Harkishan Malhotra, filed two criminal writ petitions before the Bombay High Court seeking quashing of an FIR registered ag...
