Search Results for "quash and remand"

472 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 472 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Revenue's Appeals in Income Tax Block Assessment Case - Upholds Addition of Unexplained Cash Credits Under Section 68 of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of cash credits, reversing the Tribunal's order.

The Revenue filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes POCSO Proceedings Against Accused Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Sexual Assault. Allegation of Penetration Not Supported by Medical Evidence or Victim's Statement Under Section 164 CrPC.

The petitioner, Krishnappa, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of Special Case No.28/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trust Registration Under Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 — Petitioner Lacks Standing as Trust Not Registered. Dispute over rival claims to manage a trust cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction; proper remedy is civil suit.

The petitioner, claiming to be the Vice Chairman of Krantiveer Sangolli Rayanna Residential High School Trust, filed a writ petition under Articles 22...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Quashing Petition in Forgery Case — Social Activists’ FIR Challenge Rejected. Allegations of Theft and Forgery of Demand Drafts Against Ex-Minister Require Investigation, Quashing Petition Dismissed Under Section 482 CrPC.

The present proceedings involved a criminal writ petition and criminal application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order — Agricultural Land Acquired Prior to Detention Exempt from Forfeiture. Property acquired before the 'illegal' period under Section 2(2)(b) of SAFEMA cannot be forfeited; appellate authority's order partly confirmed.

The petitioner, Ranchhodbhai Bhagwanbhai Tandel (since deceased, through his legal heir Naresh Ranchhodbhai Tandel), filed a criminal writ petition un...