Search Results for "owner impleadment"

344 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 344 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Dispute and Teacher Recruitment Cases — Upholds Single Judge's Orders on Limitation and Selection Process. In LPA No.177/2012, appeal dismissed as barred by limitation; in LPA No.288/2011, selection of respondent upheld as per rules.

The judgment comprises two Letters Patent Appeals. LPA No.177/2012 arises from a land dispute where the appellants challenged an order of a Single Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302 and 120-B IPC and Arms Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove conspiracy and identity of assailants beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of V.G. Patil, a college lecturer and political activist, on 21 September 2005. The prosecution alleged that the decea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeals Against Acquittal in Sohrabuddin Fake Encounter Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Hostile Witnesses. Acquittal Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Establish Police-Politician Conspiracy and Connection to Seized Firearms Under Sections 120B, 302 IPC and Section 378 CrPC.

The appeals arose from the judgment of acquittal dated 21 December 2018 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, in Sessions Case Nos. 177 of 2013, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Canceling Cinema License for Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Speaking Order. Appellate Authority Under Section 8A of Bombay Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1953 Cannot Cancel License Without Recording Findings on Grounds Under Section 6.

The petitioners, Deepak Joshi and the legal representatives of Ravi K. Appu, challenged an order dated 28.01.1999 passed by the State Minister (Home),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows AERA's Appeal Against TDSAT Orders Under Section 31 of AERA Act — Tariff Determination Held to Be Regulatory, Not Adjudicatory, Function. Regulatory Authority Can Challenge Appellate Tribunal's Decisions on Questions of Law.

The Supreme Court of India addressed a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of appeals filed by the Airports Economic Regulatory Author...