Search Results for "order set aside"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "order set aside"

31349 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 31349 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Interception Orders in CBI Corruption Case for Lack of Reasons and Public Emergency. Orders under Section 5(2) of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 set aside as they merely recited statutory language without recording cogent reasons demonstrating public safety or public emergency.

6 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Shyamalendu Kumar Das, a Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), challenged two orders dated 9 March 2018 and 17 March 2018 passed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions by Offshore Drilling Companies Challenging Reassessment Notices Under Income Tax Act, 1961 — Section 147 Reassessment Invalid Due to Lack of Jurisdictional Condition Precedent. The court held that reassessment notices were issued without proper application of mind and without valid reasons to believe that income had escaped assessment, and quashed the notices.

4 Aug 2023

The petitioners, Shelf Drilling Ron Tappmeyer Limited, Shelf Drilling J.T. Angel Limited, and Shelf Drilling Trident XII Limited, are companies incorp...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Suspended Director in IL&FS Accounts Reopening Case — Recasting Permitted Under Section 130 Companies Act. Court holds that SFIO and ICAI reports provide sufficient basis for reopening accounts and that suspended director lacks locus standi.

4 Jun 2019

The case pertains to an appeal filed by Hari Sankaran, a suspended director of Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services Limited (IL&FS), against th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

3 Dec 2015

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Notification Dated 16.08.2008 Imposing Forest Development Tax. Validity of Notification Questioned on Grounds of Legislative Competence and Consistency with Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Income Tax Department's Appeal Against Acquittal in Section 276CC Case — Magistrate's Closure Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-Cognizance Notice Under Section 279(1) of Income Tax Act. The court held that the requirement of sanction under Section 279(1) is a condition precedent for taking cognizance, not for filing the complaint, and the Magistrate's closure order was premature.

19 Jul 2022

The Income Tax Department filed multiple criminal appeals against the order dated 03.04.2021 passed by the Magistrate of JMFC-III Court, Belagavi, rec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Sanction Order Under Section 197 CrPC – Petitioner Alleges Improper Review of Earlier Refusal. Alleged Lack of Fresh Material and Improper Reconsideration of Evidence Previously Rejected.

22 Dec 2017

The petitioner, a public servant, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 4th February 2016 p...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Numerous Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notifications and Demands. Petitioners Contend That the Notifications under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 are Ultra Vires the Constitution and Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

28 29 30 31 32

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)