Search Results for "foreign judgment enforcement"

767 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 767 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 Upon Challenge by Trade Associations. Court Holds That Constitutional Challenge Cannot Be Abstract and Requires Factual Foundation of Adverse Action, But Proceeds to Hear Merits for Recurring Issues.

The Bombay High Court heard a batch of three writ petitions filed by trade associations—the Association of the Traders carrying the Food Business, M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Bunker Fuel Sales to Vessels on High Seas Are Taxable Under Maharashtra VAT Act. Petitioners Challenged Assessment Orders and Recovery Notices Claiming Sales Occurred Outside State Territory and Were in Course of Export.

The dispute arose from assessment and recovery proceedings under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 concerning sales of High Speed Diesel (HSD)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Constitutionality of Prohibitory Orders Under Section 144 CrPC Restricting Public Assembly. Judgment Clarifies That Reasonable Restrictions on Speech and Assembly Must Be Just, Fair and Reasonable Under Articles 19 and 21.

The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu criminal writ petition regarding the incident at Ramlila Maidan on 4-5 June 2011, involving the imposition of p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Maharashtra Excise Notifications Discriminating Against Imported Wines. Petitioner contends that the impugned notifications violate GATT national treatment principle and constitutional rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 253.

The writ petition before the Bombay High Court involved a challenge by an importer of foreign wines, holding an FL-I licence, to several notifications...