Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Involving Cooperative Housing Societies and Developer Over MOFA Compliance. Pleadings Involve Section 5A of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 and Role of District Deputy Registrar.
9 May 2025...
Search Results for "developer"
1160 result(s) found
Found 1160 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Pune Municipal Corporation Resolution and Circular on Compounding Fees for Building Irregularities. Resolution Held Ultra Vires MRTP Act and BPMC Act as No Power to Levy Such Charges for Regularization Under Section 53(3).
3 Apr 2019The case involved three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging a Resolution date...
- 106
High Court
High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute Despite Unstamped Agreement. Arbitration Clause Held Separable and Enforceable Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
2 Jan 2019The petitioners, Mr. M.N. Kumar, Mr. R. Venkata Krishna, and Mr. C.S. Mohan, filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitrati...
- 17
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute. Memorandum of Agreement dated 14.06.2012 Contains Valid Arbitration Clause.
2 Jan 2019The petitioners, three individuals, filed a petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a sole ...
- 204
High Court
Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in PIL Challenging Redevelopment Permissions in Heritage Precinct. Residents Allege Violation of Development Control Regulations and Arbitrary Administrative Actions by Municipal Authorities and Developer.
19 Oct 2018The matter before the Bombay High Court was a Public Interest Litigation filed by four residents of Carmichael Road, Mumbai, including Normandie Coope...
- 24
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Petition Challenging Mandatory Injunction in Favour of Flat Purchasers. Co-operative Housing Society Cannot Deny Membership to Purchasers from Developer Without Following Bye-Laws and Natural Justice.
12 Sep 2018The petitioner, Royal Manor Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an ord...
- 91
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
6 Feb 2015The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...
- 77
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Central Excise Classification and Cenvat Credit Disputes. The court held that the definition of 'input service' under the Cenvat Credit Rules is broad and classification of goods must be based on predominant function and commercial understanding.
30 Jul 2014The judgment involves a batch of appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against orders...
- 60
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Central Excise Classification Disputes — Cenvat Credit and Valuation Issues Decided. Classification of goods under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and eligibility for Cenvat Credit under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 determined based on functional use and technical literature.
30 Jul 2014The judgment involves multiple appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against orders o...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction Against Developer in MOFA Dispute Over Common Areas and Parking Rights. Developer restrained from constructing on open space and selling car parks as they are common facilities under Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.
24 Jun 2013The dispute arises from a development project known as Phoenix Towers in Parel, Mumbai. The appellants, Phoenix Construction Company and another, are ...
- 154
