Search Results for "auction purchase"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "auction purchase"

597 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 597 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Land Dispute Case — Concurrent Findings Set Aside Due to Non-Application of Mind by First Appellate Court. The Court Held That the First Appellate Court Must Comply with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC and Decide the Appeal on Merits After Proper Appreciation of Evidence.

30 Nov -0001

The present second appeals arise from a land dispute between the appellants (original plaintiffs) and the respondents (original defendants) concerning...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Admission of Winding-Up Petition Against Telecom Company Due to Substratum Erosion and Deadlock. Cancellation of 2G Licences and Irreconcilable Differences Between Equal Shareholders Justify Winding-Up Under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956.

8 Apr 2014

The appeal arose from an order of the company judge admitting a petition for winding up of Etisalat D.B. Telecom Limited (the company) under Section 4...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds ESI Coverage for BCCI as 'Shop' Under ESI Act — Sports Body Engages in Systematic Commercial Activity. BCCI held to be a 'shop' under notification dated 18th September 1978 issued under Section 1(5) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, as it carries out systematic commercial activities including sale of tickets, broadcasting rights, and merchandise.

24 Jun 2022

The present appeal was filed by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) against the judgment and order dated 9th September 2021 passed by the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Numerous Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notifications and Demands. Petitioners Contend That the Notifications under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 are Ultra Vires the Constitution and Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Issues Rule and Hears Matter Finally in Writ Petition Challenging MSEDCL Communication. The Court Decides the Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution with Consent of Parties After Respondents Waive Service.

6 Jun 2025

The petitioners, a private limited company and its shareholder, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High C...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Notification Dated 16.08.2008 Imposing Forest Development Tax. Validity of Notification Questioned on Grounds of Legislative Competence and Consistency with Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

3 Dec 2015

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court Clarifies Legislative Competence on Alcohol Regulation: Potable vs Industrial Alcohol" "A landmark judgment addressing the scope of State and Union powers on regulating alcohol under the Indian Constitution."

23 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India revisited the legislative competence concerning the regulation of alcohol under the Constitution. The court examined whethe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Execution Petition — Limitation for Appeal Under Section 100 CPC Not Applicable to Orders Under Order 21 Rule 32 CPC. First Appellate Court Directed to Consider Condonation of Delay Application on Merits Before Dismissing Appeal as Time-Barred.

17 Jul 2013

This second appeal was filed by the decree-holder in HRC 4/78 against the rejection of his execution petition in Exn.P.162/90 and the judgment of the ...

28 29 30 31 32

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)