NOTICE OF MOTION COMMERCIAL DIVISION NO. 196 OF 2018
27 Feb 2019...
Search Results for "arbitration and conciliation act 1996"
2223 result(s) found
Found 2223 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against High Court Order Upholding CLB's Condonation of Delay in Share Transmission Registration. Core Issue Revolves Around Interpretation of Section 58(3) of Companies Act, 2013 and the CLB's Inherent Powers to Apply Limitation Act Provisions.
1 Jan 1970The dispute centered on the condonation of a 249-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 58(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 before the Company Law B...
- 30
High Court
High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Challenging CLB Order Allowing Ingress into Plant Disputed under Business Transfer Agreement. Court Notes Contradictory Affidavits and Abuse of Process by Appellant in Claiming Possession.
30 Nov 2015The appeal arose from a Company Law Board order allowing Respondent No. 2, Rajinder Kumar Malhotra (RKM), access to Plant No. 2 of Vidyut Metallics Pv...
- 41
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Appeals by Bank in Securitisation Act Case Regarding Maintainability of Civil Suits — The Court Examines Whether Plaints Against Bank Are Barred Under Section 34 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
26 Oct 2018The litigation arose from a batch of five civil suits filed by several plaintiffs against M/s. Orbit Corporation Ltd. and Axis Bank Limited, concernin...
- 78
High Court
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3931 OF 2016
14 Dec 2016The petitioner, a former PWD Minister of Maharashtra, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging his ar...
- 64
High Court
- 59
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit — Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Limitation Is a Triable Issue. The court held that under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, only plaint averments are relevant and if they disclose a cause of action, the plaint cannot be rejected; limitation is a mixed question of law and fact.
30 Nov -0001The applicant, Mr. Ajay Wadhwa, who was original defendant No.9 in the suit, filed a Notice of Motion seeking rejection of the plaint under Order 7 Ru...
- 142
High Court
- 61
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order Refusing to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Commercial Suit — Appellant Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance. The court held that the appellant's failure to appear despite service and the lack of a valid explanation for the delay in filing the application to set aside the decree disentitled it to relief under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
27 Nov 2020The appellant, BVM Finance Private Limited, was the original defendant No.1 in a commercial suit filed by the respondent No.1, Vistra ITCL (India) Ltd...
- 82
High Court
- 35
