Search Results for "Water Supply"

1603 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1603 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 392, 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Keshav Shriram Kendre, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedpur, for the murder of Bapurao Shamrao Nagargoje, a driver ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Criminal Appeals Arising from Sessions Case No. 215 of 2006. Appeals Challenge Conviction Under Sections 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

In the present matter, the appellants, original accused Nos. 1 to 4, along with two other acquitted co-accused, were tried for the murder of six perso...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as evidence of PW-1 Maruti Koli was inconsistent and lacked corroboration.

The appellants, Yusuf Alamash Daryavardi (appellant No.1) and Arjun Bhima Jadhav (appellant No.2), were convicted by the Sessions Court, Sangli, for o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Weak Circumstantial Evidence. Appeal Under Section 378 CrPC Challenges Acquittal for IPC Sections 302, 201, 404, 419 Based on Defective Recovery, Delay in FIR, and Unestablished Last Seen.

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) CrPC against the judgment of acquittal dated 08.08.2013 passed by the Fast Track C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Appeals Against Conviction for Kidnapping, Gang Rape, and Murder of a 3½-Year-Old Girl. Trial Court Convicted Under Sections 363, 366, 377, 302, 201 Read with 34 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence.

The Bombay High Court heard criminal appeals filed by four accused/appellants against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Conviction of Trap Witness Under Section 344 CrPC for Alleged False Evidence in Corruption Case. Court Analyzed Whether Contradictory Statements During Cross-Examination Constituted Wilful Perjury as Defined Under Section 191 IPC.

The appellant was a panch witness in a corruption case tried by the Special Judge, Akola. The original case involved allegations that a Junior Enginee...