Search Results for "Telecom"

408 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 408 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses BSNL's Petition Challenging PF Liability for Contract Workers. Principal Employer Held Liable Under Para 30 of EPF Scheme for Non-Compliance by Contractors.

The petitioner, M/s Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), challenged an order dated 1.7.2013 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, Ne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition by Deutsche Bank Against Finolex Industries Under Section 433(e) Companies Act, 1956 — Disputed Derivative Transaction Debt Precludes Summary Winding-Up. Court Holds That Winding-Up Petition Is Not a Debt Recovery Mechanism and Dismisses Petition with Costs.

The judgment arises from a Company Petition filed by Deutsche Bank AG, Mumbai Branch, seeking winding-up of Finolex Industries Limited under Section 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Appeal in Debt Dispute — Company Deemed Unable to Pay Debts Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956. Debt Acknowledged by Respondent Company and Not Bona Fide Disputed, Entitling Appellant to Winding Up Order.

The Appellant, Tata Advanced Materials Ltd., filed a winding up petition against the Respondent, M/s. Tooltech Global Engineering Pvt. Ltd., under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping for Ransom and Murder in Section 364A IPC Case — Life Sentence Confirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recovery of Victim's Body. Appellants' Appeal Dismissed as Prosecution Proved Chain of Circumstances Leading to Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the kidnapping for ransom and subsequent murder of a 10-year-old boy, the son of a police constable. The appellants, Shashikant T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petitions for Non-Compliance with Statutory Notice Under Section 434 of Companies Act, 1956. Statutory notice requirement under Section 434(1)(a) held mandatory and cannot be waived by agreement between parties.

The petitioner, Dolphin Investment Pvt. Ltd., filed two company petitions under Section 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking winding up ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Impounding Order in Stamp Duty Dispute — License Agreement for Telecom Infrastructure Not a 'Lease' Under Bombay Stamp Act. Agreement for installation of cellular mobile towers on rooftops held to be a license, not a lease, thus not liable to stamp duty as a lease.

The petitioners, Bharti Telventures Limited and Sunil Bharti Mittal, were licensees under Section 4 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, to set up and o...