Search Results for "Prothonotary order"

465 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 465 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Cross-Appeals Against Remand Order in Arbitration Matter — Power of Appellate Court Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Examined. The Court held that an appellate court under Section 37 cannot remand a Section 34 petition for fresh hearing but must decide the appeal on merits.

The dispute arose from a development agreement concerning a slum rehabilitation scheme in Mumbai. The appellant, Bombay Slum Redevelopment Corporation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Unfair Labour Practice Orders — Industrial Court's Findings Upheld Under MRTU & PULP Act. Employer Denied Salary and Benefits to Employees During Strike Period, Constituting Unfair Labour Practices Under Items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV.

The petitioners, National Textile Corporation (Maharashtra North) Limited and its General Manager, challenged two orders of the Industrial Court at Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Metro Construction Method as Withdrawn, Imposes Costs for Abuse of Process. Court finds the petition was filed with oblique motive to pressurize the developer for personal demands, not genuine public interest.

The petitioner, Dr. Monica Matani, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court complaining about the construction method ado...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes ESIC Demand Notices for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice. Employer's Failure to Produce Records Does Not Justify Ex-Parte Assessment Without Proper Opportunity of Hearing.

The petitioners, a company and its director, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging various demand notices, recovery notices, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employer Directed to Reinstate Employee with Back Wages. Abandonment of Service Claim Rejected as Employee Reported for Duty After Maternity Leave.

The present petition was filed by Finlay Mills challenging an order dated 4.12.2002 passed by the Industrial Court, Bombay in Complaint (ULP) No.169 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Appeal Against Arbitration Award as Time-Barred Under Article 119 of Limitation Act. Limitation period for setting aside award runs from date of notice of filing of award, not from date of receipt of award.

The appeal arises from a judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing an arbitration petition filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 34 Petition as Time-Barred, Confirms Arbitral Award. Limitation for Filing Section 34 Petition Runs from Date of Receipt of Award, Not from Date of Filing of Wrong Remedy.

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bomb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Awards Compensation for Medical Negligence in Municipal Hospital - Extravasation Injury Leads to Loss of Fingers. Hospital Staff's Failure to Monitor IV Line Constitutes Negligence, Municipal Corporation Held Vicariously Liable.

The petitioner, Umakant Kisan Mane, was admitted to Rajawadi Municipal Hospital on 1st October 2002 following a convulsion. An intravenous line was st...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Claim for Short-Landed Cargo Due to Lack of Evidence and Limitation. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove that the consignment was loaded on board the vessel and that the suit was barred by limitation under the Indian Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925.

The plaintiff, Wallace Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for recovery of US$154,000 representing the CIF value of 40 drums of Lincomycin HCL BP ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMMERCIAL FIRST APPEAL NO. 23 OF 2025

The appellant, a partnership firm, filed a commercial suit for recovery of its claim amount after attempting pre-institution mediation. The appellant ...