Search Results for "IPC 379"

351 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 351 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in POCSO Case, Upholds Conviction for Outraging Modesty of Minor. Court Relies on Testimony of 5-Year-Old Victim and Mother, Finds No Ground to Interfere with Trial Court's Judgment Under Section 354 IPC and Section 10 POCSO Act.

The appellant, Kalim Attarli Shaikh, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 10 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against IAS Officer in Arms License Case Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Sanction. The court held that unexplained delay of 20 years and absence of valid sanction under Section 197 CrPC vitiate the prosecution.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Robert Lalchungnunga Chongthu @ R L Chongthu, an IAS officer of the Bihar Cadre, against the judgment of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Discharge of Police Constable for Suppressing Criminal Antecedents in Appointment. Failure to Disclose Pending Criminal Case in Attestation Form Constitutes Suppression of Material Information, Rendering Appointment Void Ab Initio.

The petitioner, Sri Ramesh Malli, was selected and appointed as Police Constable (Wireless) in the Karnataka Police Department on 13.06.2017. During t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Sanjay s/o Anna Sose, was convicted by the learned Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Buldana in Sessions Trial No.89/1998 for an offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Prosecution for Export of Antiquities — Prosecution Under Customs Act Not Barred by Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972. Held that the Customs Act, 1962 applies alongside the Antiquities Act, and prosecution under Sections 132 and 135 is maintainable.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court upholding the discharge of the respondent, Sharad Gandhi, from offences under Sections 132 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Hawala Operator in 2011 Mumbai Bomb Blasts Case. Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy and Funding Sufficient to Frame Charges Under MCOC Act and UAPA.

The appellant, Mr. Kawalnayan Wazirchand Pathreja, was accused no.3 in MCOC Special Case No.12 of 2011 arising from the 13 July 2011 Mumbai bomb blast...