WRIT PETITION NO. 2329 OF 2003
21 Dec 2018The petitioners, K.P. Power Private Limited and its director, filed a writ petition in 2003 before the Bombay High Court seeking a mandamus to compel ...
Search Results for "District Judiciary"
796 result(s) found
Found 796 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Voluntary Retirement Notice Before Intended Date in Service Matter - Rule 65 MCS (Pension) Rules, 1982 Does Not Bar Withdrawal. Senior Clerk's Withdrawal Request Made on Same Day Before Retirement Time Held Valid, Rejection Set Aside.
6 Jul 2026The petitioner, Vithal s/o Lingoji Kalyankar, was a Senior Clerk in the District Court at Nanded, having joined service on 06.06.1988. After about 30 ...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Possession of Flat Based on Agreement for Sale — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Payment of Full Consideration and Possession, and Suit Barred by Limitation. Agreement for Sale Does Not Confer Ownership Without Registered Conveyance; Suit for Specific Performance Barred by Limitation Under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.
24 Nov 2015The Plaintiff, Niraj Wishwanath Kochhar, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration of ownership and possession of a flat in Mumbai, ...
- 181
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Consumer Protection (Qualification for Appointment, method of recruitment, procedure for appointment, term of office, resignation and removal of the President and members of the State Commission and District Commission) Rules, 2020 — Petitioners Seek Quashing of Rule 6(1) and Rule 10(2). Rule 6(1) Selection Committee Composition with Two Executive Members Alongside High Court Judge Challenged as Violative of Doctrine of Separation of Powers and Rule 10(2) Restricting Tenure to Four Years Challenged as Denying Reappointment Eligibility.
20 Oct 2023These were three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court challenging Rule...
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Consumer Protection Rules 2020 on Selection Committee Composition and Tenure. Petitioners challenge Rule 6(1) and Rule 10(2) of the Consumer Protection Rules, 2020 as violative of separation of powers and arbitrary, seeking declaration of eligibility for re-appointment.
20 Oct 2023The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, heard three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging Rule 6(1) and Rule 10...
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Examines Constitutional Validity of Consumer Protection Rules 2020 on Selection Committee and Tenure. Advocate and Sitting District Commission Members Challenge Rule 6(1) and Rule 10(2) Alleging Violation of Separation of Powers and Seeking Re-Appointment Eligibility.
20 Oct 2023These three writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench. The ...
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considered Challenge to Shirdi Sansthan Trust Resolution and Government Resolutions on Sanitation Funding. Petition Raised Questions of Statutory Utilization of Trust Funds under Shree Saibaba Sansthan Trust (Shirdi) Act, 2004 for Municipal Services.
15 Jul 2022The matter involved two connected proceedings before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench: Writ Petition No. 6703 of 2020 filed by Shirdi Nagar Pan...
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 2(24)(xviii) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Petitioner contended that taxing capital subsidies as income violates Articles 14, 19, 246, 265 and 289 of Constitution; final decision not stated in available text.
4 Dec 2023Serum Institute of India Private Limited, a biotechnology company manufacturing drugs and vaccines with a plant at Hadapsar, Pune, filed the writ peti...
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Section 2(24)(xviii) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Petitioner Challenges Taxation of Capital Subsidies as Income. The Court considered whether inclusion of subsidies and incentives in the definition of income under Section 2(24)(xviii) violates constitutional provisions and real income theory.
4 Dec 2023The writ petition arose from a challenge to the constitutional validity of sub-clause (xviii) to Section 2(24) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, inserted b...
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Public Interest Litigation Challenging Lavasa Hill Station Project and Statutory Approvals. Petition Raises Issues of Compliance with Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, Special Regulations for Hill Station Development, and Approval of Water Weirs on Varasgaon Dam Backwaters.
26 Feb 2022The judgment under consideration stems from a Public Interest Litigation filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. The petitioner, a legal ...
