Search Results for "Development Control Regulation"

1574 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1574 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State's Power to Fix Higher Sugarcane Price in Conflict Resolution Between Constitution Benches. State Advised Price (SAP) is Valid and Not Repugnant to Central Minimum Price Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966.

The Supreme Court considered a reference from a three-judge bench regarding an alleged conflict between two Constitution Bench decisions: Ch. Tika Ram...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admits PIL Challenging Construction Permissions in Gamdevi Heritage Precinct. The court considered legality of 15-storey building under DCR 1991 and Heritage Regulations.

By way of background, the petitioners, Gamdevi Residents’ Association and others, filed a public interest litigation before the Bombay High Court ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Environmental Clearances for Passenger Jetty Project at Gateway of India. Petitioners Claim Violation of Coastal Regulation Zone Norms and Failure to Consider Alternative Site, Seeking Quashing of MCZMA Clearance and NOCs.

These three writ petitions, heard analogously by the Bombay High Court, arose from residents' associations and members in the Colaba area challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviews Appeals Against Dismissal of Section 9 Petition for Interim Measures in Redevelopment Dispute. Non-Signatories to Development Agreement Cannot Be Directed to Vacate Premises Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as They Are Not Bound by Agreement.

The matter arose from a redevelopment dispute concerning Poddar Apartment, a building comprising ground plus four upper floors with 30 flats, 44 shops...