Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in Criminal Conspiracy and Assault Case — Conviction of Appellant No.1 for Obscene Acts and Extortion Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence, While Conviction for House Trespass and Wrongful Confinement Upheld for All Appellants. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove criminal conspiracy under Section 120B IPC and that the convictions under Sections 292, 385, and 355 IPC were not sustainable for appellant no.1.
14 Jul 2015The appellants, Raju @ Ajit Sarfraj Tadvi, Shantaram Manil Sonawane, and Dhanraj Parashuram Chaudhari, were prosecuted for various offences under the ...
