CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 661 OF 2005
12 Apr 2013The case arose from Special Case No. 10 of 2001 before the III Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, where eight accused faced trial on charges of kidnap...
Search Results for "Arms Act 1959"
494 result(s) found
Found 494 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Village Pond Fish Killing Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Poisoning. Conviction under Section 429 IPC and Section 54 of the Bombay Fisheries Act, 1959 set aside as prosecution failed to prove that fish were killed by poison.
16 Oct 2006The case pertains to an incident in village Koper, Panvel Taluka, Raigad District, where the village pond was auctioned for fishing rights on 4.6.1995...
- 119
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence of 26/11 Terrorist in Mumbai Attacks Case. Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused Due to Insufficient Evidence, Finding No Perversity in Trial Court's Decision.
1 Jan 1970The Supreme Court dealt with appeals arising from the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. The appellant, Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, a Pakistani national, was conv...
- 102
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Bail Order in Murder Case Due to Erroneous Consideration of Evidence and Gravity of Offence. The High Court's grant of bail was set aside as it overlooked material charge-sheet evidence indicating the accused's involvement in conspiracy and weapon custody under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 307, 302, 336 IPC and Sections 3/25, 4/25 Arms Act, 1959.
29 Oct 2021The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur, which allowed the fifth bail application of the second respo...
- 414
High Court
Bombay High Court Holds Appeals Against Special Court Orders Outside Bench's Territorial Limits Lie Only to Principal Seat. Territorial Jurisdiction Determined by Location of Court, Not Place of Offence Under Chapter XXXI of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960.
24 Apr 2024The case involved a reference to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad to determine the territorial jurisdiction for appeals against o...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Victim's Appeal Against Acquittal in Sohrabuddin Case for Lack of Maintainability. Appellant, examined as a prosecution witness, not considered a 'victim' under Section 372 Cr.P.C. as he was not the person who suffered loss or injury directly from the crime.
5 Aug 2019The case involves an appeal filed by Mahendrasinh Jorubha Zala, who was examined as a prosecution witness (PW-205) in a trial concerning the alleged c...
- 135
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 504, 506 read with 149 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
17 Nov 2015The case pertains to two criminal appeals filed by the appellants against their conviction and sentence by the II Additional District and Sessions Jud...
- 91
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Conspiracy Case Due to Inadequate Evidence While Upholding Convictions of Other Assailants. Electronic Evidence from CCTV Footage Admissible Under Section 65-B of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 as Certification Accompanied Exhibits and No Objection Raised.
2 Mar 2022The appeal arose from a criminal case involving a shootout at a hospital resulting in the death of Rakesh alias Kala. The appellant Taqdir, who had lo...
- 306
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Corporate Debtor's Appeal Against Admission of Insolvency Application Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Erstwhile Directors Cannot Maintain Appeal After Appointment of Insolvency Professional, Signaling Paradigm Shift to Inability of Management to Continue if Unable to Pay Debts.
1 Aug 2026Background: The case arose under the newly enacted Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), which came into force in November-December 2016. The ap...
- 95
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Termination of KSPCB Chairman Based on Alleged Resignation — Finds No Voluntary Resignation and Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the Chairman of a statutory board cannot be removed without following principles of natural justice and that the alleged resignation was not voluntary.
17 Jul 2020The petitioner, Dr. M. Sudheendra Rao, was appointed as Chairman of the Karnataka State Pollution Control Board (KSPCB) vide notification dated 30.12....
- 104
