Search Results for "witness verification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "witness verification"

683 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 683 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Public Servant and Private Individuals in Corruption Case — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Proven Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for public servant and Section 12 for abettors sustained as evidence of demand and acceptance was credible and corroborated.

30 Aug 2022

The case involves three appeals against a judgment of the Special Judge (under PC Act), Greater Mumbai, convicting the appellants for offences under t...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Conviction of Sub-Engineer in Bribery Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe for Electric Connection Proved Through Trap and Recovery of Tainted Currency Notes.

9 Jun 2021

The appellant, Anil Krishnarao Apashingkar, was a Sub-Engineer with M.S.E.D.C.L. The complainant, Jagannath Rajaram Mane, applied for an electric conn...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved. Acquittal of Police Head Constable Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Upheld Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration.

7 Sep 2020

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of Ramesh Tukaram Wagh, a Police Head Constable, in Special Case (PCA) No.4/2012 by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Failure to Consider Bail Orders and Unverified In-Camera Statements Renders Detention Invalid Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug offenders, Dangerous persons and Video Pirates Act, 1981.

19 Nov 2019

The petitioner, Lakhan Rohidas Jagtap, challenged a preventive detention order dated 15 March 2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material to Show Public Order Threat. The court held that the alleged acts of the detenu only affected specific individuals and did not disturb public order, and the detaining authority failed to consider that the detenu was already in custody.

24 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Sushant Vasant Salunkhe @ Kalakhatta, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

3 Dec 2014

The appellant, Jitendra Kumar Jain, was convicted by the Special Judge, Silvassa, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Expungement of Irrelevant Portions from Affidavit of Examination-in-Chief in Testamentary Suit — Irrelevant and Prejudicial Statements Struck Out to Ensure Fair Trial. The court held that portions of an affidavit that are not relevant to the issues in the suit and are likely to prejudice the trial must be expunged under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

10 Jun 2014

The applicant, Mrs. Mahabanoo Navroz Kotwal, filed a testamentary petition for probate of the alleged last Will and Testament of Nergish Keki Cassad, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Magistrate's Order for Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC in Private Complaint — Magistrate Must Apply Judicial Mind Before Directing Investigation. Order directing investigation under Section 156(3) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 quashed as it was passed without application of judicial mind after recording verification of complainant.

7 Jan 2014

The petitioners, four individuals, filed a criminal writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Invalidation of OBC Caste Certificate in Zilla Parishad Election Case. Caste Claim of Momin Community Rejected Due to Lack of Documentary Evidence and Inconsistent School Records Under Maharashtra Act 23 of 2001.

4 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Nahidabano Pathan, challenged the order dated 19 July 2013 of the Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad, which i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Proper Verification of In-Camera Statements. The court held that in-camera statements must be properly verified by the recording officer and the detaining authority must apply its mind to their credibility under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981.

11 Oct 2006

The petitioner, wife of the detenu, challenged the detention order dated 31/10/2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai, under Section...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)