Search Results for "vested rights"

Trending :

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable for Dual Appointment and Forgery in...
Supreme Court Alters Conviction from Murder to Attempt to Murder in Absence of C...
Supreme Court Sets Aside Appointment Orders in Steel Plant Recruitment Case Due ...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Para-Teachers Seeking Regularisation in Jhark...
Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Karnataka SC/ST Land Transfer Case Due to Lach...

Search Results for "vested rights"

42 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 42 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Union and State in Consumer Protection Rules Challenge, Reversing High Court's Striking Down of Qualification and Procedure Provisions. Rules 3(2)(b), 4(2)(c), and 6(9) of Consumer Protection (Qualification for appointment, method of recruitment, procedure of appointment, term of office, resignation and removal of President and Members of State Commission and District Commission) Rules, 2020 Found Not Arbitrary Under Article 14 of Constitution of India, as They Provide Sufficient Guidelines for Appointments to Consumer Commissions.

3 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court addressed appeals by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Union of India, and State of Maharashtra against a common judgment and order ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Employer in Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme Dispute Over Application Date. The Court set aside the Delhi High Court's direction to apply the MACP scheme from 01-01-2006, holding that the scheme's effective date of 01-09-2008 under the office memorandum dated 19-05-2009 was valid, and employees not completing 24 years of service by that date were not entitled to benefits under the superseded ACP scheme.

8 Mar 2022

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of appeals concerning the applicability date of the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACP) introduced b...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Railway Employment Scheme Due to Constitutional Infirmities. The Court held that the Liberalized Active Retirement Scheme for Guaranteed Employment for Safety Staff violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution as a back-door entry mechanism, and its termination by the Railway Board was justified, with no vested rights accruing to affected parties.

25 Jan 2022

The dispute centered on the constitutional validity and termination of the Liberalized Active Retirement Scheme for Guaranteed Employment for Safety S...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Applications by Mining Contractors in Environmental Mining Dispute, Upholding Interim Arrangement for Legal Mining to Prevent Illegal Activities and Environmental Harm. The court found no vested rights for contractors based on prior bids or extensions, as its interim directions for fresh District Survey Reports and environmental clearances superseded such claims, with mining permitted through Bihar State Mining Corporation under strict conditions until 31 March 2022.

18 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court addressed multiple Interlocutory Applications arising from its order dated 10 November 2021 in civil appeals challenging the Nationa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Retired Employees in Cooperative Bank Pension Dispute - Pension Scheme Cannot Be Unilaterally Discontinued After Employees Have Opted and Availed Benefits Under Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Banks Employees Pension, Family Pension and General Provident Fund Rules, 1989. The Court held that pension is a deferred wage and accrued right, and amendments to service rules under Section 84A(2) of Punjab Cooperative Societies Act, 1961 must be prospective, protecting employees' legitimate expectations.

11 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from the Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank Ltd.'s decision to discontinue a pension scheme introduced in 1989 f...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows U.P. Housing Authority's Appeal Against Cancellation of Land Release Notification. Fraud by Land Owners in Obtaining Release Justifies Cancellation Without Fresh Acquisition Under Section 21 of General Clauses Act, 1897.

16 Dec 2021

The Supreme Court considered appeals by U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad against a High Court order that set aside a notification cancelling the release ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of CIDCO's Lease Cancellation in Tender Dispute. The court held that CIDCO's cancellation was unjustified as the partnership firm's bid was initially accepted, changes were authorized, and no concrete breaches of tender terms were proven, applying principles of promissory estoppel and administrative fairness.

29 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from a tender called by the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra (CIDCO) on 11.06.2008 for lease of land near ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in Real Estate Regulation Case, Upholding Authority's Jurisdiction and Pre-deposit Condition. The court affirmed that a single member of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to order refunds under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) is valid for statutory appeals.

11 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by promoters and real estate developers against orders of the High Court of Allahabad, which had dismissed their ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Time Limits for Awards Under Land Acquisition Laws in Appeal Against High Court Ruling on Lapse of Proceedings. The Court Examines Whether the Two-Year Period Under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Applies Post-Repeal or the Twelve-Month Period Under Section 25 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Governs Awards Under Section 24(1)(a).

10 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for the Gosikhurd Project. On 16th June 2011, a notification...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Service Law Dispute Over Recruitment Rules Implementation. The High Court's review of its 2011 judgment was set aside as it misread the precedent in BSNL vs. Mishri Lal & Ors. and erroneously found the Assistant Director (Official Language) Recruitment Rules, 2002, were not implemented, despite evidence of promotions and pay revisions under those rules.

21 Sep 2021

The dispute involved employees of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) who were appointed as Hindi Translators and Telecom Office Assistants in 1988-19...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)