Search Results for "unauthorised excavation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "unauthorised excavation"

39 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 39 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Under MPDA Act for Lack of Evidence of Public Order Disturbance. Sand Smuggling and Criminal Acts Do Not Automatically Justify Preventive Detention as They Pertain to Law and Order, Not Public Order.

3 Aug 2020

The petitioner, Baliram s/o Namdeo Bedke, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MCGM Demand Notice for Unauthorised Construction Penalty Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. Section 53(1) of MMC Act, 1888 does not empower the Corporation to levy penalty for unauthorised construction after the fact; remedy lies in demolition under Section 351 or regularisation under DCR.

17 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Zenith Tins Private Limited, a company engaged in manufacturing, challenged a demand notice dated 20th January 2015 issued by the Muni...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenant for Unauthorized Subletting and Misuse of Premises Under MHADA Act. Tenant failed to prove lawful sub-tenancy and used residential premises for commercial purposes, violating terms of allotment.

7 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Ashok Trivikram Wagle, was a tenant of a residential premises owned by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHA...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Notification Dated 16.08.2008 Imposing Forest Development Tax. Validity of Notification Questioned on Grounds of Legislative Competence and Consistency with Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

3 Dec 2015

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Constitutional Validity of Section 98A and Notification Examined. The petitioners contended that the notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand of forest development tax from holders of mining leases in forest areas were repugnant to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and ultra vires the State's legislative competence.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various entities inc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 is...

High Court

KAHC010479002008_1

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Decides Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)