Search Results for "tri-partite settlement"

82 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 82 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admits Winding Up Petition Against Syrma Technology Pvt. Ltd. for Non-Payment of Admitted Debt Despite Insurance Payment. Court holds that receipt of insurance proceeds does not extinguish the debt or bar winding up proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, Jiangsu Skyrun Wuxi Co. Ltd., filed a company petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of Syrma Tec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Employer's Writ Petition Against Labour Court Order Allowing Workman's Claim for Full Wages under Section 33(C)(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Maintainability of an Individual Workman's Application after Settlement by Other Workmen Examined.

The petitioner, Mulberry Silks Ltd, a company engaged in silk fabric manufacturing, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constituti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Ex-Wife's Appeal for Share in Husband's Properties in Family Property Dispute. Wife failed to prove financial contribution or common intention for joint ownership under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The appellant, Ms. Adhyaatmam Bhamini, filed an appeal against the judgment dated 24th January 2003 of the Family Court, Mumbai, which dismissed her p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Appeal in Debt Dispute — Company Deemed Unable to Pay Debts Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956. Debt Acknowledged by Respondent Company and Not Bona Fide Disputed, Entitling Appellant to Winding Up Order.

The Appellant, Tata Advanced Materials Ltd., filed a winding up petition against the Respondent, M/s. Tooltech Global Engineering Pvt. Ltd., under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Direction to Provide Arbitration in Expired Toll Collection Contracts. Clause 36 of Agreement Held Not an Arbitration Agreement; Court Cannot Direct Parties to Arbitrate Under Article 226.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by M/s. MEP RGSL Toll Bridge Pvt. Ltd. and Raima Toll & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., both specia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging MHADA's Land Allotment for Housing Society Redevelopment Under MHADA Act, 1976. Court upholds MHADA's power to allot land and rejects allegations of illegality and lack of locus standi.

The judgment pertains to two petitions, Writ Petition No. 3 of 2013 filed by Shreeprakash Ramganesh Dube and Public Interest Litigation No. 27 of 2013...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.2457 OF 2012

The Bombay High Court was seized with four writ petitions filed by various trade unions representing aircraft engineers, technical staff, and technici...