Search Results for "temporary injunction"

1571 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1571 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Temporary Injunction Against Petitioners in Cooperative Bank Recovery Dispute. Balance of convenience and irreparable loss to the bank justify restraint order pending final decision of the dispute.

The petitioners, Shankar Govind Mali and others, challenged an order passed by the court below which temporarily restrained them from transferring, se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Application to Set Aside Dismissal of Appeal for Non-Compliance of Order to Bring Legal Representatives on Record. Order XXXIX Rule 11 CPC Held Inapplicable to Dismissal for Default; Sufficient Cause Not Shown Under Order XLI Rule 17 CPC.

The appellants, original defendants in a suit for damages, filed Regular Civil Appeal against the decree granting damages to the respondents. During t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Temporary Injunction in Specific Performance Suit — Non-Signatory Co-Owners Cannot Be Restrained Based on Agreement They Did Not Sign. Refusal to Perform by Non-Signatory Does Not Constitute Prima Facie Case for Injunction.

The case involves an appeal against an order granting temporary injunction in a suit for permanent injunction and specific performance. The appellants...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Patent Infringement Appeal — Refuses Temporary Injunction Due to Lack of Prima Facie Case. Mere Registration of Patent Does Not Establish Validity; Plaintiff Must Show Strong Prima Facie Case for Interim Injunction.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal and a cross-appeal arising from a suit for patent infringement. The appellant/plaintiff, a patent holder, fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. Plaintiff's Registered Mark 'RISO' for Rice Bran Oil Protected Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'RISOLITE' Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Kamani Oil Industries Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Bhuwaneshwar Refineries Pvt. Ltd. seeking a perpetual injunction for trademark in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Property Dispute Over Injunction Orders — Held That First Appellate Court Erred in Granting Injunction Without Considering Balance of Convenience and Prima Facie Case Under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The case involves two appeals filed by the appellants against the judgment and order of the First Appellate Court in Regular Civil Appeal Nos. 615/201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction Against Defendant for Trademark Infringement and Passing Off of Identical Mark SPASGAN in Pharmaceutical Preparations. Plaintiff's Registered Trademark SPASGAN Entitled to Protection Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Wockhardt Limited, filed a suit against Eden Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. seeking to prevent infringement and passing off of its trademark SPAS...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'EVANOVA' vs 'ECONOVA' for Pharmaceutical Products. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Under Section 29 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Charak Pharma Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. seeking a perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant fr...