NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2486 OF 2005
30 Nov 2005The suit was filed by shareholders of Spice Jet Ltd, a domestic airline company formerly known as Modi Luft, which had undergone several ownership cha...
Search Results for "take notice"
16517 result(s) found
Found 16517 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Petitioner in MRTP Act Violation for Non-Restoration of Toilet Block — Notice Not Served to Petitioner as Required Under Section 53(1)(7) of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. The court held that the requirement of notice is a condition precedent for prosecution, and without it, the process against the petitioner is not maintainable.
10 Feb 2005The petitioner, D.N. Punamiya, challenged the issuance of process against him by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 41st Court, Mumbai, in Criminal ...
- 133
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion for Determination of Priority of Claims Against Sale Proceeds of Arrested Vessel in Admiralty Suit. The court directed that the order of priority of claims against the sale proceeds shall be determined after the expiration of a period specified by the court and that a notice inviting claims be published under Sub-rule 951(3) of the Bombay High Court Rules.
19 Oct 2012The plaintiff, Sparebanken Sogn og Fjordane, a Norwegian bank, filed an admiralty suit against the vessel m.v. BOS ANGLER and its owner Bos Angler AS,...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Nagpur Municipal Corporation Challenging District Judge's Jurisdiction to Extend Notice Period Under MRTP Act. District Judge Has Jurisdiction Under Section 286(3) of City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 to Extend Notice Period for Notice Issued Under Section 53(1) of MRTP Act, 1966.
22 Feb 2012The Nagpur Municipal Corporation issued a notice to the respondent under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP A...
- 61
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Show-Cause Notice in Hoarding Removal Case Due to Premeditated Decision — Show-Cause Notice Issued by Deputy Municipal Commissioner Conveyed Final Decision Without Leaving Scope for Genuine Response, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.
21 Feb 2023The petitioners, M/s Sine Fine Advertising Pvt. Ltd. and its director, challenged a show-cause notice dated 11/01/2023 issued by the Deputy Municipal ...
- 58
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge by CFS Operators to Customs Public Notices. Petition Under Article 226 Seeks Quashing of Notices Allegedly Imposing Unlawful Restrictions on Container Freight Stations.
5 Jun 2017The petitioners, comprising thirteen Container Freight Station (CFS) operators and thirteen individual directors, filed a writ petition under Article ...
- 36
High Court
Madras High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 Income Tax Act as Time-Barred; Notice Dispatched on 1st April 2021 Beyond Limitation. Reopening Based on Accommodation Entry Information Without Independent Material Held Invalid for AY 2013-14.
20 Feb 2025The petitioner, a proprietor of a petrol bunk, challenged a reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2013...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reasons and Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the Assessing Officer failed to provide recorded reasons to the assessee and did not apply his mind to the fact that the transaction was already disclosed and examined during the original assessment under Section 143(3).
5 Sep 2023The petitioner, Ashraf Chitalwala, an individual resident of India, filed his original return of income for Assessment Year 2015-16 on 27th September ...
- 106
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case, Clarifying Jurisdiction Requirements Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court Held That Service of Section 21 Notice and Inclusion in Section 11 Application Are Not Prerequisites for Arbitral Tribunal to Exercise Jurisdiction Over a Person, and Impleadment is Based on Being Party to Arbitration Agreement.
17 Apr 2025The dispute arose from an agreement dated 01.06.2012 between the appellant and respondent no. 1 to form a Limited Liability Partnership (respondent no...
- 286
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Challenging MCGM Notice Under Section 354A of MMC Act — Suit Held Not Maintainable Due to Bar of Section 527 of MMC Act and Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Section 354A(3). The court held that the civil court's jurisdiction is barred when a statute provides a complete mechanism for redressal.
9 Oct 2013The appellant, M/s. Akash Impex, a registered partnership firm, acquired suit property Gala No.24/25, CTS No. 240-C at Khetani Industrial Estate, Kurl...
- 138
