Search Results for "survival employment"

108 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 108 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Termination of Dealership for Breach of No-Other-Employment Clause. Appellant's failure to disclose employment with a private company while holding a petroleum dealership constituted a material breach of the Dealership Agreement and Marketing Discipline Guidelines.

The appellant, P. Kalyanasundaravalli, was the proprietrix of M/s K.T. Bakthavatchalam Naidu Agency, an Indian Oil Corporation dealer. She was selecte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Sets Aside MACT Dismissal for Failure to Prove Negligence. Claimant's evidence of rash driving by respondent motorcyclist found sufficient to establish negligence under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Mr. Sameer S. Desai, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Against Subsistence Allowance Order in De Novo Enquiry. Employee dismissed after departmental enquiry is entitled to subsistence allowance during de novo proceedings before Labour Court under Model Standing Orders.

The petitioner, Mumbai Cricket Association, challenged an order of the 12th Labour Court, Bombay, dated 15th October 2010, which directed the payment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Pharmacists in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Termination of daily-wage pharmacists appointed through proper selection held to be unfair labour practice under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971, and reinstatement with back wages upheld.

The State of Maharashtra and its officers (petitioners) filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Labour Court dated 25-8-2000 in Complaint (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Recognizes Menstrual Hygiene as Integral to Right to Education and Dignity. Court Emphasizes State's Obligation to Provide Free Sanitary Pads and Separate Toilets in Schools Under Articles 14, 21, and 21A.

The writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed by a social worker seeking judicial intervention to address the widespread lack of me...