Search Results for "suo-motu writ petition"

52 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 52 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petitions Challenging CGRF Orders on Recovery of Additional Charges from Consumers. MERC Orders on FAC and AEC Recovery Upheld as Binding on Distribution Licensee.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a group of writ petitions filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging orders...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Denial of Permission for Ayurvedic College Admission. Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Application of Mind; Direction to Reconsider After Hearing.

The petitioners, Shri Gajanan Maharaj Sansthan Pusad and its Ayurvedic Medical College, challenged an order dated 19.07.2019 passed by the Union of In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Ex-Trustee's Deletion from Revision Proceedings in Trust Dispute. Joint Charity Commissioner's Order Set Aside for Violating Natural Justice and Misapplying the Test of Necessary Party Under Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1951.

The petitioner, Janak Dilip Dwarkadas, an ex-trustee of respondent no.3 trust (Bai Kabibai and Hansraji Morarji Charity Trust), filed a writ petition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Caste Scrutiny Committee Order Cancelling Scheduled Caste Certificate Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Committee Failed to Provide Documents and Opportunity to Cross-Examine Complainant, Rendering Proceedings Void Under Maharashtra Act No. XXIII of 2001.

The petitioner, Bhanudas Hona Gajbhiv, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Scheduled Cast...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Suo Moto Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land Ceiling Act Due to 16-Year Delay. The Court Held That Revisional Power Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time, and a Delay of 16 Years Is Unreasonable.

The petitioner, Ansiram Gundiram Gavane, was a landholder in Parbhani, Maharashtra. In 1975, he filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Ceiling Act Case Due to Inordinate Delay in Reopening Enquiry. Suo Moto Enquiry Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands Ceiling on Holdings Act, 1961 Cannot Be Initiated After 17 Years from Original Order.

The petitioner, Ashok Rangrao Deshmukh, a resident of Parbhani, filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands Ceiling on Holdin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Against Exparte Labour Court Award for Violation of Natural Justice. Employer Denied Opportunity to Defend Due to Non-Service of Notice, Award Set Aside and Matter Remanded.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by the employer, the Deputy Engineer of Zilla Parishad Constructions, challenging an exparte award p...