Search Results for "summon witness"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "summon witness"

458 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 458 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Directing Prosecution to Examine Additional Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC — Power Cannot Be Used to Fill Gaps in Prosecution Case. The court held that summoning uncited witnesses to fill lacunae is beyond the scope of Section 311 CrPC and violates the accused's right to a fair trial.

8 Jul 2010

The case involves a criminal application filed by the accused (applicants) challenging an interim order passed by the 1st Ad hoc Additional Sessions J...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Summoning of Additional Accused in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Lack of Strong and Cogent Evidence. Vague Allegations in FIR Without Identification of Persons Insufficient to Invoke Section 319 CrPC.

1 Jan 2019

The present appeal arises from a matrimonial dispute where the complainant, S. Nallasamy, alleged that on 05.05.2011, his wife's relatives and others ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Police Official in Summoning Order Under Section 319 Cr.P.C. - Upholds Trial Court's Decision Based on Consistent Witness Evidence. The Court Found Sufficient Evidence to Summon Officials for Alleged Extortion and Corruption Under Sections 166, 383, 385 IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Without Requirement of Sanction Under Section 197 Cr.P.C. and Section 19 PC Act.

5 Jan 2024

The appeal arose from a criminal revision dismissed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, which upheld a Trial Court order summoning the appellant ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Trial Court’s Order Allowing Prosecution to Examine Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC After Evidence Closure and Section 313 Examination

11 Dec 2018

The case involved two Criminal Writ Petitions filed by accused persons challenging an order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, dated 27 Sep...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Victim's Appeal in Criminal Case for Summoning Additional Accused Under Section 319 CrPC. Court Held That Trial Court and High Court Erred in Rejecting Application Based on Examination-in-Chief of Injured Eye-Witness Without Appreciating Evidence on Merits, as Power Under Section 319 CrPC Can Be Exercised Even on Single Witness Testimony.

24 Aug 2021

The dispute arose from an FIR registered on 27.07.2016 at Police Station Assandh concerning the death of Amarjit Singh and injuries to Manjeet Singh, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Trial Court's Order Refusing to Summon Defence Witnesses in MCOC Case. Issue Pertains to Relevance of Confessions of Other Accused Persons Recorded Under Section 18 of MCOC Act in a Separate Trial.

26 Nov 2012

The appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from an order passed by the Special Court under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 (MC...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Summoning of Witness in Sessions Trial — Prosecution's Right to Examine Witness Upheld Under Section 311 CrPC. The court held that the prosecution has the right to choose its witnesses and the trial court correctly exercised its power under Section 311 CrPC to summon a witness whose evidence was essential for a just decision.

15 Jan 2010

The applicant, Mahesh s/o Mohan Nimje, was an accused in Sessions Trial No. 512 of 2007 pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur. The pros...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Summoning Plaintiff for Cross-Examination Without Examination-in-Chief Under Section 138 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Plaintiff Not Examined-in-Chief Cannot Be Compelled for Cross-Examination, and Defendant Cannot Summon Plaintiff as Own Witness Following Privy Council Precedent.

24 Feb 2020

The petitioner, as plaintiff in an injunction suit (O.S. No. 1963/2002), challenged a trial court order dated 15.10.2019 that allowed the respondent-d...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Summon Additional Accused Under Section 319 CrPC — Insufficient Evidence of Complicity. The Court upheld the concurrent findings of the trial court and High Court that the complainant failed to present strong and cogent evidence to warrant summoning the proposed accused.

10 May 2019

The appellant, Shiv Prakash Mishra, lodged an FIR on 06.09.2013 alleging that respondent No.2, Subhash Chandra Shukla, along with four others, formed ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Summoning Order Under Section 319 CrPC Against Appellants in Murder Case — Insufficient Evidence as Only Witness Retracted and Other Witnesses Exonerated Them. The court held that the stricter satisfaction standard under Section 319 CrPC was not met, as the sole witness's contradictory and retracted statement did not constitute strong and cogent evidence.

2 May 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals against the High Court's refusal to quash a summoning order under Section 319 Cr.P.C. The case arose from the mu...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)