WRIT PETITION NO. 4810 OF 2012
12 Sep 2012The case involves a group of writ petitions filed by former employees of National Organic Chemicals Ltd. (NOCIL) against Relene Petrochemicals Ltd. (n...
Search Results for "strike during conciliation"
142 result(s) found
Found 142 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Dispute Resolution Clause Providing for Commissioner's Decision and Government Appeal. Clause 16 of Agreement Stating Governance by Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Constitutes Arbitration Agreement, and Withdrawal of Previously Constituted Tribunal Due to Allegations Necessitates Fresh Appointment.
3 Aug 2010The applicant, Shri Sai Trading Company, a partnership firm, entered into an agreement dated 27th April 2006 with the respondent, Sangli Miraj & Kupwa...
- 52
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal's Refusal to Strike Out Additional Written Statement. Tribunal's Discretion to Allow Additional Pleadings Upheld Unless Prejudice Shown.
29 Mar 2006The petitioner, GTL Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 10.2.2006 passed...
- 87
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Workmen's Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Award in Industrial Dispute — Termination Found Illegal Under Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Reinstatement with Continuity of Service and Full Back Wages Granted as Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions Renders Retrenchment Void.
2 Apr 2024The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by workmen against Kirloskar Ebara Pumps Ltd. challenging the Labour Court's award dated 30th April ...
- 120
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Labour Court Awards in Industrial Dispute Cases. Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld for Workmen Found to Have Completed 240 Days of Service and Terminated Without Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
25 Jun 2021The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by Duncan Engineering Ltd. (erstwhile Schrader Duncan Ltd.) challenging separate awards passe...
- 82
High Court
Bombay High Court Addresses Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator; Validity of 20% Claim Cap Clause Under Scrutiny. The Court Examines Whether a Contractual Condition Limiting Arbitration to Claims Not Exceeding 20% of Contract Value Is Arbitrary and Discriminatory.
28 Jan 2026The dispute arose from a contract dated 7 May 2018 between a contractor and the Central Railways for the preparation of design and structural drawings...
- 14
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator's Award in Contract Dispute Over Final Bill Claims. Court Held That Arbitrator's Consideration of Vitiating Factors and Contract Clauses Was Permissible Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Despite Prohibition on Further Claims in Clauses 65 and 65A.
23 Mar 2023The dispute arose from a contract dated 02.07.2001 for repair works, with time extended to 19.01.2002. The respondent contractor submitted a final bil...
- 180
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Challenging Dismissal of Workman and Tribunal's Order in Industrial Dispute; Outcome Not Specified
11 Oct 2019The workman, employed as an Accountant since 1995 and later promoted, was an active union member. On 25.11.2013, a strike notice under Section 22(1)(B...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Awards in Information Technology Upgrade Contract Dispute. Petition Challenges Awards Granting Refund and Rejecting Counter Claims.
6 Feb 2015The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by CMC Limited (original respondent in the arbitration) impugnin...
- 10
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Restricting Legal Representation Without Consent. Employer Seeks to Quash Labour Court Order Barring Engagement of Advocate in Industrial Dispute Reference.
1 Mar 2018The petitioner, a company engaged in manufacturing, dismissed the respondent workman for misconduct after due process in August 2015. The workman rais...
- 40
