Search Results for "stolen property"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "stolen property"

466 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 466 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Theft and House-Trespass — Presumption Under Section 114 Evidence Act Upheld Based on Recent Possession of Stolen Articles. The accused was convicted under Sections 380 and 457 IPC for night-time theft of gold ornaments and cash, and the courts below correctly invoked the presumption of recent possession under Section 114 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

14 Jan 2019

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Imran Khan @ Banti Noorkha Pathan (the accused) against his conviction by the Judicial Magi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal in Railway Property Theft Case. Prosecution Failed to Prove Theft of Railway Property, Hence Possession Alone Not Sufficient for Conviction Under Section 3(a) of Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966.

9 May 2017

The State of Maharashtra filed two appeals against a common judgment dated 04.06.2001 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Railway Court, Pu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Seized Vehicle in Wildlife Offence Case — Truck Not Automatically Government Property Upon Seizure Under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. Interim Custody Granted Pending Trial as Forfeiture Requires Conviction Under Section 51 of the Act.

11 Dec 2012

The applicant, Jagjeet Singh Kalsi, filed a criminal application under Section 482 CrPC challenging the orders of the Judicial Magistrate First Class,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Robbery Case Under Section 392 IPC. Identification by Witnesses and Recovery of Stolen Property Sufficient to Sustain Conviction.

7 Feb 2019

The judgment concerns two criminal appeals arising from a common conviction under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for robbery. The appellants, Sh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Recovery — State fails to prove guilt under Sections 395 and 397 IPC as witnesses could not identify accused and no stolen property recovered.

27 Jul 2018

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 16.02.2004 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kelapur, in Sessions Trial...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Dacoity and Murder in Nagpur Bench. Conviction under Section 396 read with Section 397 IPC confirmed based on identification evidence and recovery of stolen property.

17 Feb 2015

The appellant, Sanjay @ Papdya @ Pawan @ Prashant @ Rahul Kale @ Pawar Bhosale @ Chavhan, was convicted by the Extra Joint (Ad hoc) Additional Session...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Informant Against Forfeiture of Seized Cash to State in Dacoity Case — Cash to be Returned to Informant as Accused Disclaimed Ownership. The court held that when accused disclaim seized cash, it should be returned to the victim-informant under Section 454 CrPC.

9 Nov 2017

The appellant, Nanasaheb Nirmal, was the original informant in a dacoity case. He was robbed of cash and articles on 27 June 2000. During investigatio...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 395 and 397 IPC set aside as identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen property was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

23 Sep 2014

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for dacoity and robbery with attempt...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Railways Property Act Case — Failure to Prove Seized Goods Were Railway Property. Confessional Statements and Lack of Independent Witnesses Lead to Acquittal Under Section 3(a) of Railways Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966.

11 Nov 2019

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of two accused persons, Mohammed Ibrahim Lal Mohammed and Mohd. Arshad Mohd. Ibrahim, who were...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Robbery Under Section 392 IPC. Identification by Witnesses and Recovery of Stolen Property Sufficient to Sustain Conviction.

7 Feb 2019

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of conviction dated 24.3.2004 passed by the 1st Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)