RFIRST APPEAL NO. 3732 of 2023
30 Jan 2026The High Court of Gujarat heard two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Limite...
Search Results for "stock loss"
729 result(s) found
Found 729 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State's Appeals in VAT Input Tax Credit Dispute — Rule 21(8) of Punjab VAT Rules Valid Despite Absence of Specific Enabling Provision in Parent Act at Time of Introduction. Input Tax Credit is a Facility, Not a Vested Right; State Can Restrict ITC on Stock-in-Trade to Reduced Tax Rate.
4 Mar 2025The Supreme Court considered appeals by the State of Punjab against a High Court judgment that had struck down Rule 21(8) of the Punjab Value Added Ta...
- 414
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Madras Converts Writ Petition into Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation for Investigation into Illegal Beach Sand Mining. The Court Clarifies that the Scope Covers All Beach Sand Minerals and that Amendments to MMDR Act, 1957 and Atomic Concession Rules, 2016 Do Not Render the PIL Infructuous for the Period Prior to 2016.
17 Feb 2025The case originated as a writ petition filed by Dr. G. Victor Rajamanickam concerning allegations of massive illegal mining and sale of Beach Sand Min...
- 61
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Fire Insurance Claim Limitation and Assessment. Complaint was within limitation as cause of action was continuing due to insurer's subsequent actions like appointment of investigator and correspondence, under Section 24A of Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and NCDRC's award based on surveyor's report was upheld.
18 Aug 2021The dispute arose from a fire insurance claim where the insured, a manufacturer, suffered total destruction of plant, machinery, and stock due to a fi...
- 399
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Challenging Section 140(3)(iv) of CGST Act on Transitional Credit for Pre-GST Stock. Petitioners Argue Arbitrary Cut-Off Date Leads to Double Taxation and Discrimination.
20 Mar 2018A group of manufacturers and traders, including JCB India Limited, manufacturers of excavators and loaders, filed writ petitions before the Bombay Hig...
- 12
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitral Tribunal's Findings of Fact and Rejects Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
14 Jul 2016The judgment concerns multiple arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral awa...
- 84
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Trading Dispute — Upholds Arbitrators' Findings on Contract Notes and Liability. Court holds that failure to object to contract notes within reasonable time amounts to acceptance under NSE Bye-Laws and that arbitral tribunal's findings on facts and law are not open to challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
18 Jan 2014The petitioner, Harinarayan Bajaj, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award date...
- 118
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Port Development Dispute — Liquidated Damages Claim Rejected Due to Lack of Proof of Actual Loss. The court held that under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, proof of actual loss is necessary for claiming liquidated damages, and the arbitrator's finding was not patently illegal.
10 Dec 2013The petitioner, Board of Trustees for Jawaharlal Nehru Port, a body corporate under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, entered into a licence agreement ...
- 91
High Court
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 4 OF 1986
12 Apr 2013The petition filed under sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, sought to challenge an interim award and certain directions issued by the so...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Lockout Not Covered Under Riot and Strike Policy. Consequential loss claim fails as lockout is not a peril insured under the fire and riot/strike extension policies.
30 Aug 2010The appellant, M/s. Century Textiles & Industries Ltd., a public limited company, filed a suit against four insurance companies (Oriental Fire & Gener...
- 59
