High Court of Bombay Decides Writ Petition No. 1811 of 2019 Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The specific outcome and legal findings are not disclosed in the provided judgment excerpt.
15 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "statutory override"
885 result(s) found
Found 885 result(s)
High Court
Deemed Conveyance under MOFA – Rejection of Application by Competent Authority Set Aside. High Court of Bombay – Writ Petition under Article 226 – Challenge to Rejection of Deemed Conveyance – Developer’s Delay in Redevelopment Not a Justification – Statutory Rights under Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 Upheld – Competent Authority Directed to Issue Conveyance Certificate
18 Feb 2025Constitution of India, Article 226 – Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management, and Transfer) Act, ...
- 1032
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Office Memorandum Allowing Post Facto CRZ Clearance for Permissible Activities. Environmental Organization Contended That the 2021 Circular Contravenes Mandatory Prior Clearance Requirement Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
24 Sep 2024The present Public Interest Litigation invoked the jurisdiction of the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging th...
- 810
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Union and State in Consumer Protection Rules Challenge, Reversing High Court's Striking Down of Qualification and Procedure Provisions. Rules 3(2)(b), 4(2)(c), and 6(9) of Consumer Protection (Qualification for appointment, method of recruitment, procedure of appointment, term of office, resignation and removal of President and Members of State Commission and District Commission) Rules, 2020 Found Not Arbitrary Under Article 14 of Constitution of India, as They Provide Sufficient Guidelines for Appointments to Consumer Commissions.
3 Mar 2023The Supreme Court addressed appeals by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Union of India, and State of Maharashtra against a common judgment and order ...
- 345
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses University's Petition Challenging Tribunal Order Setting Aside Retirement of Professor-Cum-Director at Age 60. Retirement Age of Director Held to Be 65 Years Under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 and University Ordinances, Not Subject to Reduction by Management Council Resolution.
28 Feb 2023The University of Mumbai filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 20.09.2019 passed by the Mumbai University and College Tribunal in Appeal N...
- 18
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty in Consumer Dispute, Overturns High Court's Limitation Bar. Stamp Duty Refund Application Not Barred by Six-Month Limitation Under Section 48(3) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 When Stamp Paper Purchased Bona Fide and Transaction Failed Due to Judicial Order from National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.
24 Sep 2021The dispute originated from the appellant's booking of a residential apartment in Pune in 2014, where he paid stamp duty for an agreement to sell. A d...
- 485
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Vehicle Ownership in Favor of Auction Purchaser Despite Pending Tax Dues. Held that the transferee cannot be saddled with prior tax liabilities of the transferor under Section 50 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
6 Apr 2021The petitioner, Raman Roadways Private Limited, a private limited company engaged in transportation business, filed a writ petition under Article 226 ...
- 32
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Order in Tax Assessment Writ Petition Due to Statutory Remedy Foreclosure. High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Entertaining Writ Petition After Statutory Appeal Was Dismissed as Time-Barred Under Section 31 of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005.
6 May 2020The dispute arose from a tax assessment order dated 21.6.2017 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes against the respondent, a regis...
- 299
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Secured Creditors in SARFAESI Act Case — Holds Chief Judicial Magistrate Competent Under Section 14. The Court resolved the conflict among High Courts by interpreting that the CJM can exercise powers under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, for taking possession of secured assets in non-metropolitan areas.
23 Sep 2019The Supreme Court resolved a conflict among High Courts regarding the interpretation of Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financi...
- 242
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Sales Tax Notices Against Axis Bank in Liquidation Proceeding — No Liability for Tax Deducted at Source Under MVAT Act After Company's Winding Up. The Court held that the State cannot recover tax from a secured creditor who had no obligation to deduct tax at source under Section 42 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, as the deduction obligation arises only when payment is made to the dealer, and after winding up, the Official Liquidator is the proper authority.
7 Mar 2017The petitioner, Axis Bank Ltd., a banking company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court s...
- 69
