Search Results for "statutory amalgamation"

144 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 144 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Official Liquidator's Report in Winding Up of Transpower Engineering Ltd. — Holds Sale by Liquidator is Formal Transfer Not Subject to Differential Premium. Court exercises powers under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956 to waive extension charges claimed by MIDC.

The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking directions regarding the sale of two industrial plots allotted by MIDC to Transpower Engineering Ltd. (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Varun Global Limited for Non-Payment of Loan Debt. Life Insurance Corporation of India Succeeds in Proving Company's Inability to Pay Debts Under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Sanctions Composite Scheme of Arrangement and Amalgamation Involving Transfer of Business and Reduction of Capital — No Objection from Regional Director or Income Tax Department.

The High Court of Bombay considered two company scheme petitions seeking sanction of a composite scheme of arrangement and amalgamation. The transfero...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order in Income Tax Case for Non-Compliance with GKN Driveshafts Procedure. Revenue failed to communicate order rejecting objections and passed assessment order within four weeks, violating principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Capgemini India Pvt. Ltd., challenged a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the subsequent reassessment order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Multiple Transferor Companies with Pebble Bay Developers Private Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956. Court found compliance with statutory requirements and no objections from stakeholders, thus approving the amalgamation.

The Bombay High Court considered a Company Summons for Direction filed by Advantage Raheja Developers Private Limited, one of the Transferor Companies...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals of Retired Employees Against Cooperative Bank's SARFAESI Recovery Proceedings. Employees Held Not to Be 'Borrowers' and Lack Locus Standi to Challenge Auction Sale Without Payment of Dues.

The judgment pertains to a batch of Letters Patent Appeals filed by retired employees of Shamrao Vithal Cooperative Bank Ltd. against the dismissal of...