Search Results for "spousal objection"

36 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 36 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Upheld. Insurance Company Failed to Prove Breach of Policy Conditions or Negligence of Deceased Pedestrian; Compensation Award Confirmed.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal representatives of the deceased Palaniyandi, who died in a road accident on 19.10.2019....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Insurance Appeal and Dismisses Cross Objections in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation for Contributory Negligence. Deceased's contributory negligence assessed at 40% upheld, but compensation reduced under certain heads.

The case arises from a motor accident on 19th February 2010 on the Pune-Mumbai Express Highway. The deceased, Jignesh Parekh, was driving his car when...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation Upheld. Tribunal's assessment of deceased's income based on income tax returns and application of multiplier of 17 held proper under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., challenged the judgment and award dated 21/07/2004 passed by the Claims Tribunal, Pune in Motor Accident ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Multiplier Corrected from 10 to 17 and Future Prospects Added for Deceased Driver Aged 27 Years.

The appellants, widow and minor children of deceased Maruti Alhat, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Transfer of Assistant Professors from Autonomous College. Government retains administrative control over employees recruited before grant of autonomy, and transfer order is not ultra vires.

The petitioners, Assistant Professors, were recruited by the State Government before their college became autonomous. Subsequently, the government tra...