Search Results for "spot inspection"

414 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 414 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Conviction Set Aside Due to Gaps in Chain of Circumstances. Failure to Prove Motive and Last Seen Theory Beyond Reasonable Doubt Leads to Benefit of Doubt Under Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 302, 201, 120B.

The appellant, Vrishal Madhukar Kalane, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 302, 201, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the mur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Multiple Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Evidence. Convictions under Section 395 IPC set aside as test identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen property was not linked to the accused.

The case involves multiple appeals against a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, convicting several accused for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Sarpanch Challenging Disqualification for Encroachment Due to Lack of Notice. Prior notice of inspection is mandatory before disqualifying a member under Section 14(1)(J-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Rekha Dadajwar, was the Sarpanch of Dabhad Village Panchayat. She was removed from office under Section 14(1)(J-3) of the Maharashtra ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Appellants convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for murder of Chhotu @ Surjeet, with recovery of weapons under Arms Act, 1959.

The case pertains to the murder of Chhotu @ Surjeet on 31.10.2001. The deceased was last seen with the appellants Shabbir and Ravi Mandal (along with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Gulshan Kumar Murder Case — Life Imprisonment for Murder and Attempt to Murder Confirmed. Evidence of Identification by Injured Witness and Recovery of Weapon Held Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The judgment pertains to the murder of Gulshan Kumar Dua, the founder of T-Series, who was shot dead on 12 August 1997. The appellant, Abdul Rauf Dawo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dagadu Vishvanath Gaikwad, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife Sunita. The prosecution's case was based on c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Lack of Evidence of Truck Involvement. Claimants failed to prove that the accident was caused by the rash and negligent driving of the truck driver under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal was filed by the National Insurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Dhule i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Lack of Evidence of Truck Involvement. Tribunal's finding of rash and negligent driving by truck driver set aside as claimants failed to prove that the accident involved the insured truck.

The present appeal was filed by the National Insurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Dhule i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Accused in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Procedural Irregularities. Conviction under Sections 135 and 138 of Electricity Act, 2003 set aside as prosecution failed to prove tampering beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Anandrao Madhavrao Shinde, was convicted by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, in Special Case No.126 of 2006 for offe...