Madras High Court Decides Second Appeal in Property Dispute among Legal Heirs under Section 100 CPC. First Appellate Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree Questioned on Substantial Questions of Law.
14 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "sound disposing mind"
250 result(s) found
Found 250 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Considers Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 498A and 302 IPC. The Court Framed Issues on Trial Validity Due to Accused’s Mental Condition and Adequacy of Prosecution Evidence Including Hostile Witnesses.
21 Dec 2020The criminal appeal arose from the judgment and order of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge at Raichur in S.C. No.1/2015 convicting the acc...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Will Dispute Case — High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Preliminary Decree Set Aside. Registered Will Fails to Meet Attestation Requirements Under Section 63(c) of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Evidence Act, 1872.
17 Dec 2019The case concerns a dispute over a tenement originally allotted to Suhagwanti Devi, the wife of late Harbans Lal, under a redevelopment scheme. After ...
- 150
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Partition Suit and Upholds Wills in Family Property Dispute. Wills and Codicils Executed by Testator and Testatrix Found Valid, No Undue Influence or Lack of Testamentary Capacity Established.
22 Aug 2019The judgment concerns a family dispute over the estate of Chimanlal Chinai and his wife Shardaben Chinai. The plaintiffs, legal heirs of Dinkar Chinai...
- 144
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeals Against Trial Court Decree Declaring Will Null and Void and Granting Partition. Appellants Challenge Declaration That Will Dated 30.06.1993 Was Executed Under Suspicious Circumstances; Final Judgment Text Incomplete.
16 Aug 2019The High Court of Karnataka heard two connected regular first appeals under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and ...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Letters of Administration with Will Annexed in Testamentary Suit — Will Proved to be Duly Executed and Attested. Court holds that the propounder of the Will has discharged the burden of proving due execution and attestation under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
5 Mar 2019The plaintiff, Mahendra Gajanan Karve, filed a Testamentary Petition No. 514 of 2004 seeking Letters of Administration with the Will annexed in respec...
- 151
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Suit for Alleged Will of 1975 Due to Non-Prosecution and Failure to Prove Execution. The court held that the propounder must prove due execution and attestation under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and failure to lead evidence results in dismissal.
10 Oct 2017The suit was filed by the plaintiffs, who were great grandsons and other relatives of the deceased, seeking probate of an alleged Will dated 3rd Janua...
- 110
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Petition in Testamentary Suit No. 13 of 1994 — Will Not Proved Due to Suspicious Circumstances. Propounders Failed to Discharge Burden of Proving Due Execution Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
13 Aug 2013The plaintiffs, Harish Vithal Kulkarni and Shivanand Vishwanath Warty, claiming to be executors under a Will dated 11th October, 1991 of Mahadeo Sabni...
- 97
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Grant of Letters of Administration — Will Proved by Attesting Witness Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The Court Held That the Propounder Removed All Suspicious Circumstances and the Will Was Genuine.
7 Dec 2006The appeal arose from a judgment of a single judge granting Letters of Administration to the respondent, Rakesh Phoolchand Jain, in respect of the las...
- 84
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Applicant in Medical Treatment Withdrawal Case — CANH Held to Be Medical Treatment and Withdrawal Permitted Under Best Interest Principle. Right to Die with Dignity under Article 21 Recognised to Include Withholding of Life-Sustaining Treatment from Patient in Permanent Vegetative State.
1 Jan 1970The matter arose from a tragic accident in 2013 when Harish Rana, then a 20-year-old engineering student, fell from the fourth floor of his accommodat...
- 26
