Search Results for "siphoning"

126 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 126 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.

The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal of Former Director in Fraudulent Trading Case Under Section 66 IBC. The Tribunal upheld the finding that the appellant siphoned funds and engaged in wrongful trading during liquidation of Easytech Global Private Limited.

The present appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) was filed by Mr. Gopal Kalra, the erstwhile director of M/s Easy...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition by Foreign Shareholder Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 272(1)(e) Companies Act, 2013. Section 272(1)(e) is not ultra vires the Constitution; second proviso to Section 272(3) does not apply to petitions under Section 272(1)(e).

The petitioner, Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of Mauritius and a shareholder of Devas Multimedia Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Arbitration Petition Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Holds That Scope of Interference Under Section 37 Is Limited and Impugned Order Did Not Suffer From Patent Illegality or Perversity.

The petitioners, Wind World (India) Limited and others, filed an arbitration petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Bogus Purchases Case — No Jurisdictional Error Found. Settlement Commission's Discretion to Accept Additional Income Disclosure Under Section 245D of Income Tax Act, 1961 Upheld as Not Perverse or Unreasonable.

The Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax, Pune) filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 21 September 201...