Search Results for "section 4 notification"

40 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 40 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Upholds Additional Compensation at Rs. 37 per sqm for Narmada Project Canal. Reference Court's reliance on earlier comparable sale instance with similar notification date held valid under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The present appeal was filed by the State of Gujarat through the Special Land Acquisition Officer and others, challenging the judgment and award dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case, Upholds Additional Compensation for Dharoi Canal Project. Court Relies on Coordinate Bench Precedent for Same Village and Common Group, Finding No Ground to Interfere with Reference Court's Award.

The present appeal was filed by the State under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Upholds Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case for Canal Project — Market Value Increased from Rs. 10 to Rs. 110.70 per sqm. Reference Court's Determination Based on Comparable Sale Instances and Principles of Fair Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Upheld.

The case pertains to three first appeals filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeals for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case for Irrigation Scheme. Market value determined at Rs.308.25 per sq. mtr. with 10% escalation for delay in notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The present appeals were filed by the claimants challenging the judgment and award dated 03.09.2021 passed by the learned Reference Court in LAR No.24...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Due to Reliance on Post-Notification Sale Deed. Reference Court's award set aside as sale deed dated after Section 4 notification was not a valid comparable instance under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (VIDC), filed an appeal against the judgment of the reference Court in LAC No. 660 of 2007,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case - Market Value Enhanced to Rs.30 per sq.mtr. for Village Percolation Tank Project. Potential Value and Comparable Sale Instance Considered Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves multiple first appeals filed by original claimants whose agricultural lands in village Vaiju Babhulgaon, Taluka Pathardi, District A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Case — Market Value of Agricultural Land Fixed at Rs.50,000 per Hectare Based on Sale Deed of Similar Land.

The State of Maharashtra filed four first appeals against a common judgment and award dated 29.11.2004 passed by the Reference Court in Land Acquisiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Payment of Compensation for Land Acquired Without Following Procedure Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Possession Taken in 2003 Without Formal Acquisition; Court Orders Completion of Proceedings and Compensation with Interest.

The petitioner, Balbhim Shamrao Ghumare, owned agricultural lands in village Pargaon Ghumara, Taluka Patoda, District Beed. Part of his land was requi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Reduces Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Market Rate Fixed at Rs. 150 per sq.metre Instead of Rs. 263.20 per sq.metre. Reference Court's enhancement set aside due to lack of comparable sale instances and failure to consider the land's paddy field character.

The case involves a land acquisition dispute where the Government of Goa acquired 1635 square metres of land belonging to the respondent, Smt. Victori...