Search Results for "section 22A"

149 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 149 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process in NI Act Complaint Due to Bar Under SICA Section 22A. Proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 cannot continue against a sick company without BIFR consent.

The petitioners, a company and its directors, challenged the order dated 20.04.2018 passed by the 25th Joint Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Judicia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.

The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Draft Development Plan and Extension Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. General Body Resolution Modifying Draft Plan Upheld as Legislative Function; Ex Post Facto Extension Held Permissible.

This judgment arose from writ petitions filed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court challenging the notification dated 4 February 2016 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Allotment of Gairan Land for PMAY Housing Due to Violation of Section 22A of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Collector's Order Set Aside for Failure to Establish Non-Availability of Alternative Land Before Diverting Common Pasture Land.

The petitioners, Santosh Madhukar Bhondve and others, filed a writ petition challenging the allotment of 1H 46R of land in Gut No.96, situated at Mauj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Sanction of Scheme of Arrangement Amid BIFR Pendency. Maintainability Under Sections 391 and 394 of Companies Act, 1956 Against Overriding Effect of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Considered.

The petitioner, Ashok Organics Industries Ltd., incorporated in 1973, filed a petition under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking ...