Search Results for "section 18"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "section 18"

89 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 89 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Land Acquisition Reference — Delay of 10 Days Condoned as Sufficient Cause Shown Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963. Court Held That Liberal Approach Should Be Adopted to Avoid Depriving Claimants of Substantial Rights Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

30 Nov -0001

The Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Executive Engineer filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application before the Bombay High Court at Goa seeking co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Land Acquisition Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 12(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Award Set Aside for Lack of Proper Notice to Interested Persons. The court held that mandatory notice under Section 12(2) must be given to persons interested not present at the award, and limitation for reference under Section 18 runs from date of knowledge.

30 Sep 2013

The applicants, Chandrashekhar Bhayaji Khawale and Gajanan Bhayaji Khawale, were owners of agricultural land in Khadka, Seloo, Wardha. Their land was ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Compensation Award of ₹1,653 per sq. ft. in Land Acquisition for Road Formation. Claimant's Appeal for Further Enhancement Dismissed as Reference Court's Market Value Determination Based on Comparable Sale Deed Was Just and Proper Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

2 Jul 2021

The appellant, Sri C. Krishnappa, was the owner of 800 sq. ft. of land in property No.13/A, Sy.No.340/1, Kempapura village, Bengaluru, which was acqui...

High Court

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Land Acquisition Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Market Value Determined at Rs. 100 per sq. yard Based on Comparable Sale Instances and Development Potential. Court Held That Acquired Land Had Building Potential and Was in a Developing Area, Warranting Higher Compensation.

13 Jun 2005

The case pertains to a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed by the claimants (owners of the acquired land) seeking enha...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal by Special Land Acquisition Officer and Chief Engineer, Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd., in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Market Value of Acquired Land Fixed at Rs. 16 per sq. metre Upheld. The reference court's enhancement of compensation was based on evidence and no interference was warranted under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

11 Mar 2005

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Chief Engineer, Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd., against the Awar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Reference Despite Delay — Knowledge of Award Date Determines Limitation Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Claimant Not Present at Award, Applied for Certified Copy Promptly, Application Within Limitation.

19 Jul 2005

The petitioner, Narayan Bhikaji More, was the owner of agricultural land acquired by the State Government for the Kal Project at Roha, Raigad District...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside DRAT Pre-Deposit Condition in SARFAESI Appeal — Petitioner Granted Relief Without Pre-Deposit. The Court held that the DRAT's power to waive or reduce pre-deposit under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act is discretionary and must be exercised judiciously, and that the condition of depositing 25% of the debt amount was onerous and disproportionate.

1 Jul 2020

The petitioner, M/s. Sanjeevini Drug House, a proprietorship concern, had availed credit facilities from Kavery Grameena Bank (respondent No.1). Upon ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Anticipatory Bail to Accused in SC/ST Atrocities Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Caste-Based Intent. Land Dispute Not Sufficient to Attract Atrocities Act Without Specific Allegation of Intent to Humiliate on Caste Grounds.

3 Dec 2019

The appellants, Keshav Reddy Yeltiwar and his two sons, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Accused in SC/ST Atrocities Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Intent to Humiliate on Caste Basis. Mere use of caste name without insulting intent does not attract Section 3(1)(r)(s) of SC/ST Act, 1989.

5 Dec 2019

The case arises from an appeal filed by ten accused persons against the order of the Special Court under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Accused in SC/ST Atrocities Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Intent to Humiliate on Caste Basis. Land Dispute Leads to Assault and Caste Abuse, but Court Finds No Prima Facie Case Under Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of SC/ST Act, 1989.

6 Nov 2019

The appeal was filed by six accused persons against the order of the Sessions Court rejecting their application for pre-arrest bail in Crime No. 91 of...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)