High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal by Special Land Acquisition Officer and Chief Engineer, Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd., in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Market Value of Acquired Land Fixed at Rs. 16 per sq. metre Upheld. The reference court's enhancement of compensation was based on evidence and no interference was warranted under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

High Court: Bombay High Court
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Chief Engineer, Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd., against the Award dated 6.9.2002 passed by the Second Additional District Judge, Panaji, in Land Acquisition Case No. 211/1996. By Notification dated 23.9.1991, an area of 1,58,781 sq. metres was acquired for the Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd., including 3575 sq. metres of Survey No. 168/2 of Village Malar, Tiswadi Taluka, belonging to the respondent, Dr. Edgar Silveira. On 7.3.1994, the Land Acquisition Officer declared the Award and fixed the market value of the acquired land at Rs. 16 per sq. metre. Dissatisfied, the respondent sought reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, claiming compensation at Rs. 200 per sq. metre. In the reference court, the respondent examined himself as AW.1 and one other witness. The reference court enhanced the compensation. The appellants challenged the enhancement in this appeal. The High Court, after hearing the parties, dismissed the appeal, upholding the reference court's decision. The court found no merit in the appeal and affirmed the compensation awarded.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Compensation - Market Value - Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - The respondent sought reference under Section 18 claiming higher compensation for land acquired for Konkan Railway. The Land Acquisition Officer had fixed market value at Rs. 16 per sq. metre. The reference court enhanced the compensation. The appellants challenged the enhancement. Held that the reference court's determination was based on evidence and no interference was warranted. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reference court was justified in enhancing the compensation for the acquired land from Rs. 16 per sq. metre to a higher rate?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. The Award dated 6.9.2002 passed by the Second Addl. District Judge, Panaji, in Land Acquisition Case No. 211/1996 is upheld.

Law Points

  • Land Acquisition Act
  • 1894
  • Section 18
  • Market value determination
  • Reference court
  • Burden of proof
  • Appreciation of evidence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (03) 87

First Appeal No. 19/2003

2005-03-11

A.P. Lavande, J.

Mr. E. Afonso, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. A.F. Diniz, Advocate for the respondent.

1. Special Land Acquisition Officer (North Goa), Konkan Railway Corporation Limited, Amey Guest House, Davorlim Road, P.O. Navelim, Salcete, Goa 403 707. 2. Chief Engineer, Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd., Rawnfond, near Margao Railway Station, Margao- Goa.

Dr. Edgar Silveira, r/o. Defence Colony, Porvorim, Goa.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against enhancement of compensation in land acquisition reference.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to set aside the Award dated 6.9.2002 passed by the Second Addl. District Judge, Panaji, enhancing compensation.

Filing Reason

Appellants were aggrieved by the enhancement of compensation by the reference court.

Previous Decisions

Land Acquisition Officer declared Award on 7.3.1994 fixing market value at Rs. 16 per sq. metre. Respondent sought reference under Section 18. Reference court enhanced compensation.

Issues

Whether the reference court was justified in enhancing the compensation for the acquired land?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the reference court erred in enhancing compensation. Respondent supported the reference court's decision.

Ratio Decidendi

The reference court's determination of market value was based on evidence and no interference was warranted.

Judgment Excerpts

By this appeal, the appellants challenge the Award dated 6.9.2002, passed by the Second Addl. District Judge, Panaji in Land Acquisition Case No.211/1996.

Procedural History

Notification dated 23.9.1991 for acquisition. Award by Land Acquisition Officer on 7.3.1994 at Rs. 16 per sq. metre. Respondent sought reference under Section 18. Reference court enhanced compensation. Appellants filed First Appeal No. 19/2003 before High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 18
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal by Special Land Acquisition Officer and Chief Engineer, Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd., in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Market Value of Acquired Land Fixed at Rs. 16 per sq. metre Upheld. The...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaints Against Air India Under Contract Labour Act — Ground Handling Services by Foreign Airlines Not Covered as 'Contract Labour'. The Court held that the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970 do...