Search Results for "sand excavation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "sand excavation"

63 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 63 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order Against Sand Smuggler Due to Non-Application of Mind. Preventive detention set aside as detaining authority failed to consider custody and lack of public order impact.

7 May 2026

The petitioner, Shubham Balasaheb Kardule, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Illegal Sand Mining Case Involving Wildlife Sanctuary and Public Safety Threats. Court Issues Directions to States for Compliance with Environmental Laws and Addresses Fatal Attacks on Forest Guards and Risks to Infrastructure Due to State Apathy and Institutional Failure.

17 Apr 2026

The Supreme Court of India initiated suo motu proceedings on March 13, 2026, in response to reports of rampant illegal sand mining within the National...

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petition and Quashes Penalty Orders Against Farmer in Revenue Dispute Due to Procedural Irregularities and Violation of Natural Justice. Revenue Authorities Imposed Penalty for Alleged Illegal Sand Excavation Based on Contradictory Evidence and Without Proper Inquiry or Hearing, Violating Due Process Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.

26 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a 75-year-old farmer challenging penalty orders imposed by revenue authorities for alleged illegal sand excavation from his agric...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Demand of Contribution to District Mineral Foundation Under Rule 45(1A) of Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 — Rule Held Ultra Vires the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. The court quashed demands for DMF contribution as a condition for mineral dispatch, ruling that Rule 45(1A) is beyond the rule-making power under Section 15 of the MMDR Act.

7 Apr 2022

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by mining lessees challenging the demand for contribution to the District Mineral Foundation (DMF) und...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Auction Amount to Highest Bidder in Sand Block Case Due to Non-Possession and Arbitrary Denial by State. State's Failure to Give Possession and Refund Deposit Violates Article 14 and Principles of Model Litigant.

14 Feb 2020

The appellant, Popatrao Vyankatrao Patil, was the highest bidder in a public auction conducted by the District Collector, Satara, for sand blocks in t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Condition Levying Royalty on Excavation of Earth for Reservoir Construction — Excavation of ordinary earth for construction of earthen dyke within leased land does not constitute 'mining' under MMDR Act, 1957.

4 Nov 2019

The petitioner, M/s. JSW Steel Limited, is an integrated steel plant that was allotted 629.92 acres of land by the Karnataka Industrial Area Developme...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Illegal Sand Mining Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under MMDR Act. Petitioner/Accused No.1 Charged Under Section 379 IPC and Sections 21, 22 of MMDR Act for Alleged Theft of Sand – Proceedings Quashed as Cognizance Without Required Sanction Under Section 22 of MMDR Act is Invalid.

16 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Shri Rudrappa, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C. No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Notice for Excavation of Ordinary Earth Without Permit — Holds That Prior Approval Under Section 21(6) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 Is Not Required for Government Companies Executing Railway Projects. The court found that the notice proposing penalty for excavation of minor mineral without permission was invalid as the petitioners were a Public Sector Undertaking of the Ministry of Railways and the excavation was for a public purpose.

29 Mar 2019

The petitioners, Ircon International Limited (a Public Sector Undertaking of the Ministry of Railways) and others, challenged a notice dated 4th Decem...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind — Insufficient Time Between Endorsement of In-Camera Statements and Issuance of Detention Order. The court held that the Detaining Authority did not have sufficient time to apply its mind properly, vitiating the detention order under Section 2(a)(iv-a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

10 Oct 2016

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Nilesh Dnyaneshwar Desale, challenged the detention order dated 16.3.2016 passed by the District Magistrate, Ja...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Labour Cooperative Society Challenging Abolition of Reservation for Sand Ghats. Statutory Reservation Under Mines and Minerals Act and Rules Cannot Be Overridden by Executive Government Resolution.

4 Dec 2013

The petitioners, a Labour Cooperative Society and its President, filed a writ petition challenging Clause 39 of Government Resolution dated 12.3.2013 ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)