Search Results for "sanction under Section 279"

189 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 189 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Prosecution of Directors for Delayed TDS Deposit Under Section 276B Income Tax Act — Delay Not Equivalent to Failure to Pay. Vicarious Liability Requires Specific Averments of Being In-Charge and Responsible; No Notice Under Section 2(35) or Order Under Section 201(1) Passed.

The petitioners, directors of M/s. Hubtown Ltd., challenged the issuance of process against them under Section 276B r/w 278B of the Income Tax Act, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Assessee for Delay in Filing Income Tax Return Due to Lack of Mens Rea and Departmental Delay. Section 276CC of Income Tax Act, 1961 requires wilful failure to furnish return; mere delay without culpable mental state does not constitute offence.

The petitioner, Rajkumar Agarwal, proprietor of Sainath Stone Crusher, filed four criminal petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Examines Quashing Petition in Alleged Fraudulent Land Grant by Bagair Hukum Saguvali Samithi. Petitioners Allege Complaint is Vague and Lacks Specifics, Claiming Sanction under Section 197 CrPC Required.

The case arose from a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash an FIR registered by Belur P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Court Clerk for Criminal Breach of Trust and Forgery of Records. Property Clerk misappropriated muddemal property and amounts, and made false entries in registers, convicted under Sections 409, 466, 477 IPC.

The applicant, Kanhaiyalal Damahe, was a property clerk in the Court of Civil Judge Junior Division, Saoner, from 1.6.2001 to 31.5.2005. During his te...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging ED Summons Under PMLA; Petitioners Argue Income Tax Offences Not Scheduled Offences

The batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka. The petitioners, inc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Kerala Hears Criminal Appeal of Accused Convicted Under Sections 279 and 337 IPC and Section 146 r/w 196 MV Act in Fatal Road Accident Case. Accused Challenged Identity as Rider and Conviction, While Court Examined Whether Section 304A IPC Could Be Convicted Without Charge.

The appeal arose from the judgment dated 21.06.2016 in S.C.No.648/2013 of the First Additional Sessions Court, Ernakulam, whereby the sole accused was...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Heard Petition to Quash Process Issued in Tax Evasion Complaint under Section 276-C(2) of Income Tax Act. Petitioners Argued That Nil Dues Certificate and Full Payment of Tax, Penalty, and Interest Negated the Allegation of Wilful Attempt to Evade Tax.

The present matter arose from a criminal writ petition filed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa under Article 226 of the Constitution of India rea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes FIR in Rash Driving Case Based on Compromise Between Parties. Offences Under Sections 279, 338, 504 IPC Held to Be Non-Serious and Compoundable with Court's Permission, Allowing Quashing in the Interest of Justice.

The petitioner, Padmanabh Rawal, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Petitioner Due to Lack of Specific Allegations and Improper Condonation of Delay. FIR and Chargesheet Failed to Attribute Any Specific Words or Acts to the Petitioner, and Delay of Almost Three Years in Filing Chargesheet Was Not Justified.

The petitioner, Sanjay Nirupam, challenged an order dated 28.04.2015 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bhandara, which condoned a delay o...