Search Results for "sanction under NDPS Act"

30 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Seven Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unlawful Assembly and Common Objection Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC set aside as evidence failed to establish membership of unlawful assembly or common object to commit murder.

The case involves seven appeals filed by Ganpat Bapu Salunkhe, Shahaji Vasant Patil, Vinodsingh Shamsingh Rawat, Chandrakant Dhodiba Tikone, Appa Suba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Assault on Public Servant Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 353, 294, 506 IPC and Arms Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ranjitsingh Gulabsingh Chungade, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola in Sessions Trial 234/2002 for offences under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Essential Commodities Act Case Due to Invalid Investigation by Assistant Commissioner of Police. Investigation by officer not of rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police violates Section 6A of Essential Commodities Act, 1955, leading to quashing of FIR and proceedings.

The petitioners, Sarvesh Kumar Shahi and Samiresh Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the initiation of proceedings ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Life Convict Seeking Premature Release — State's Order Requiring 26 Years Imprisonment Set Aside. Court holds that Government Resolution dated 15th March 2010 requires specific finding of exceptional violence to deny premature release after 14 years.

The petitioner, Santosh @ Sonu Balram Jadhav, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment on 21st July...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Forfeiture of Property Under SAFEMA Despite Revocation of Detention Order. Property of Detenu Forfeited Under Sections 7 and 19(1) of SAFEMA Upheld as Detention Order Was Valid When Forfeiture Order Was Passed.

The petitioner, Smt. Padma Nirmal Agarwal, challenged the forfeiture of a flat (Flat No.16, 471/C, Manu Mahal, King's Circle, Mumbai) under the Smuggl...