Search Results for "revised return"

330 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 330 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Case, Holding That Acceptance of Delayed Possession Without Protest Does Not Waive Right to Interest Under Section 18 of RERA. Statutory Right to Interest Under RERA Cannot Be Waived by Mere Acceptance of Possession Without a Clear Agreement.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Order in MVAT Act Case Due to Limitation Bar and Violation of Natural Justice. Assessment Order Passed After Four-Year Limitation Period and Without Granting Personal Hearing Despite Request.

The petitioner, a dealer registered under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act), challenged an assessment order and notice of demand fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Amalgamated Company Must File Return for Pre-Amalgamation Period. Section 153A Notice Validly Issued to Transferor Company Despite Amalgamation, and Failure to File Return Attracts Penalty Under Section 276CC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) against the order of the Delhi High Court, which had ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Order in VAT Case Due to Limitation Bar — Reassessment Order Passed Beyond 5-Year Limitation Under Section 39(1) of KVAT Act, 2003 Cannot Be Sustained Despite Court Direction. Court Directions Cannot Extend Statutory Limitation Period.

The petitioner, M/s. Federal Mogul Goetze (India) Ltd., filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Revision Petitions in VAT Case — Land Cost Deduction at 40% Upheld. Assessee failed to prove actual land cost exceeding 40% of sale consideration under KVAT Act, 2003.

The petitioner, M/s. Nandi Constructions, a builder and civil works contractor engaged in construction and sale of apartments, filed revision petition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reimbursement of Expenses Disclosed in Return and Application Under Section 195(2) Sought, No Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The petitioner, Monitor India Pvt. Ltd., a subsidiary of a Dutch company, challenged a notice dated 22 March 2011 issued under Section 148 of the Inco...