Search Results for "reverse presumption"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "reverse presumption"

467 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 467 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act Not Rebutted. The court held that the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption that the cheque was issued for discharge of a debt or liability, leading to conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

19 Sep 2006

The appellant-complainant filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, alleging that the accused-respondent issued a c...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. Failure to Prove Loan Repayment or Dispute Existence of Debt Leads to Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

26 Jul 2024

The appellant-complainant, Sri Krishna Reddy M, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act Not Rebutted by Accused. The court held that the accused failed to prove his defence on preponderance of probabilities and the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt.

19 Sep 2006

The appellant, Smt. Prabha Gandhi, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, Manohar Deshmukh, by the Judicial Magistrate First...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Restores Concurrent Findings of Fraud in Property Dispute Between Siblings — General Power of Attorney and Sale Deeds Set Aside as Void. The court held that the plaintiff had sufficiently proved fraud by preponderance of probabilities, and the High Court erred in reversing the concurrent findings without establishing perversity.

1 Jan 2020

The dispute arose between the plaintiff, Joginder Kaur (since deceased, represented by her daughter Nirmal Gill), and her step-brothers and step-siste...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Trial Court Erred in Not Framing Proper Points of Determination and Ignoring Legal Presumption in Favour of Complainant.

12 Feb 2014

The appellant, original complainant Sunil Thukral, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment and order dated 19/01/2011 of the Judicial Magistrate ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Complainant's Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Case — Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act Not Rebutted by Accused. The court held that the accused failed to rebut the presumption of legally enforceable debt under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Act.

7 Dec 2020

The appellant, Kiran Rameshlal Bhandari, filed two criminal appeals challenging the judgment and order dated 20.02.2017 passed by the learned Judicial...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal for Dishonour of Cheque. Presumption under Section 139 of NI Act stands unless rebutted by accused; failure to rebut leads to conviction.

9 Apr 2025

The appellant, Sri B.R. Anand, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment of acqui...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Reverses Acquittal. The court held that the trial court erred in failing to apply the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and that the accused failed to rebut the presumption.

23 Jul 2019

The appellant, Doshi Brothers, a proprietary concern, filed a private complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against M/s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 applies when signature on cheque is admitted, shifting burden on accused to rebut existence of debt.

10 Mar 2010

The appellant, Bapurao s/o Motiram Mankar, a senior citizen, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted by accused.

31 Jan 2018

The appellant, Dr. Kailash Charkha, was the original complainant in Summary Criminal Case 160 of 2004 before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Wash...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)