Search Results for "retail dealership"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "retail dealership"

51 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 51 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Dealership Agreement — Holds That Termination Without Proper Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Is Invalid. The Court found that the termination of the petitioner's dealership by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. was in violation of principles of natural justice and the terms of the agreement.

26 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Ashwinkumar Suresh Pardeshi, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the termination of his dealership agreemen...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 9 Petition for Interim Measures in Commercial Matter. Arbitration Act, 1996 invoked for pre-arbitral relief in a contractual dispute.

6 May 2025

This petition, filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, sought interim measures from the Bombay High Court. The petitioner...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes First Appeal No. 10836 of 2023 Against Decree in Special Civil Suit No. 181 of 2017. Judgment Reserved on 6 February 2025 and Pronounced on 23 April 2025.

23 Apr 2025

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), a Government of India undertaking, filed a first appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging the judg...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal, Directs Removal of Fixtures and Equipment from Retail Outlet After Termination of Dealership Contract. Dealer's Right to Not Run Trade Upheld, Liberty to Claim Damages as per Agreement Given to Oil Company.

26 Feb 2025

The dispute arose from the termination of a petroleum dealership contract between Indian Oil Corporation Limited and M/s A.R.Agencies, a dealer runnin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Candidature for Retail Outlet Dealership Due to Invalid Land Documents. Petitioner's land documents executed after application date were not valid, and her candidature could be considered under Group 3.

23 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Meenakshi Rajkumar Sonawane, filed a writ petition challenging the communication dated 29.06.2019 by which her candidature for allotme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Police Patil Challenging Cancellation of Kerosene Retail Licence. Police Patil is not a Government Servant and is Permitted to Engage in Local Business Under Rule 8 of the Maharashtra Village Police Patil Rules, 1968.

31 Aug 2012

The petitioner, Ishwar S/o Vithalrao Mohite, is a Police Patil and has been running a retail kerosene shop in village Ghodki, Tq. Washi, Dist. Osmanab...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Dealer in Termination Dispute. No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as Arbitrator's Findings Were Plausible and Not Perverse.

25 Jul 2012

The Petitioner, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL), a government oil company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Revisional Authority Order in Fair Price Shop Resignation Dispute — Minister's Revision Allowed Without Notice to Petitioner Violates Natural Justice. Resignation from dealership cannot be accepted without formal acceptance by competent authority under the Maharashtra Essential Commodities (Public Distribution System) Order, 2005.

8 Aug 2011

The petitioner, Mangu s/o Basu Rathod, was a fair price shop owner and held a licence for retail sale of kerosene at village Manjerjawla. He claimed t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Dealership Agreement for Violation of Natural Justice — Indian Oil Corporation's Communication Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Principles of Audi Alteram Partem. The court held that termination without proper show cause notice and opportunity of hearing is arbitrary and liable to be quashed.

29 Apr 2010

The petitioner, Parbat s/o Namdeo Naikwadi, was a dealer of Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) at Gardani, Akole, Ahmednagar. He filed a writ petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Civil Court Order Refusing Reference to Arbitration in Dealership Dispute. Arbitration Clause in Agreement Mandates Reference Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

12 Apr 2006

The case involves a dispute between Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL) and its dealer, M/s. Parshwa Auto Center. HPCL had issued a show-cause...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)