Search Results for "residential order"

3425 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3425 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Revisional Order Granting FL-III Licence in Residential Colony — Revisional Authority Failed to Consider Police Reports and Residents' Objections Under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.

The petitioners, residents of Vidarbha Housing Board Colony, Raghuji Nagar, Nagpur, challenged the order dated 30.10.2010 passed by the State Governme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Case on Residential Complex Construction. Construction of Residential Complex for ITC Limited for Use as Guest House Not Taxable as Commercial or Industrial Construction Service Under Section 65(105)(zzq) of Finance Act, 1994.

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise, Service Tax & Customs) against the order of the Customs, Excise & Service ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MHADA Housing Allotment — Petitioner's Challenge to Eligibility of Allottees Fails. Court holds that MHADA's decision to allot flats to respondents was within its administrative discretion and not arbitrary under Article 226.

The petitioner, Ved Prakash Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging the a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against High Court Order Protecting Open Spaces in JVPD Scheme. Layout Reservation of 1967 Prevails Over Development Plan of 1999 Under DCR.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals against the Bombay High Court judgment that declared two plots in JVPD Scheme, Mumbai, as mandatory open spaces an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge Against CIDCO's Revocation of Change of User Permission — Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel Applied Against Public Authority. CIDCO Cannot Revoke Permission After Allottee Acts Upon It to Its Detriment.

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Ambica Developers, a sole proprietorship of Mr. Madeva Patel, was allotted Plot No. 1 in Sector 1, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Writ Petition Challenging Orders Restricting Redevelopment of Cooperative Society under PWR-219 Scheme. Court frames issues regarding requirement of prior permission from Social Welfare Department for redevelopment using additional FSI/TDR.

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a co-operative housing society challenging orders dated 8 June 2016 and ...