Search Results for "removal before term"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "removal before term"

1251 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1251 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Restores Removal of Up-Sarpanch and Panchayat Member for Illegal Attempt to Transfer Sarpanch's Statutory Powers | Section 39 Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act

25 Feb 2026

The petitioner, elected Sarpanch of Hiware Village Panchayat, sought removal of Respondent Nos. 5 (Up-Sarpanch) and 6 (Member) under Section 39(1) of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications Against Eviction Decree for Unlawful Subletting and Structural Alterations. Lease Deed Did Not Confer Right to Sublet Without Landlord's Consent; Subletting to Associate Companies and License to Third Party Constituted Unauthorized Subletting Under Section 108(o) of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

12 Nov 2024

The case involves a dispute over the eviction of tenants from a godown in Mumbai. The plaintiff, Saidpur Jute Co. Ltd., owned Godown No. 63 and leased...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch Under Section 39(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 — Lack of Proper Enquiry and Non-Application of Mind. The court held that removal without affording opportunity of hearing and without proper enquiry is unsustainable.

24 Jun 2022

The petitioner, Shri Jagdish Mannalalji Sancheriya, was directly elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Anji (Mothi), District Wardha in March 2019 fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Shareholders' EGM Requisition in Zee Entertainment Dispute — Upholds Right to Convene Meeting Under Section 100 of Companies Act, 2013. Court holds that shareholders holding 17.88% stake have statutory right to requisition EGM for removal of directors and that the company cannot restrain such meeting on grounds of alleged illegalities in proposed resolutions.

22 Mar 2022

The case involves an appeal by Invesco Developing Markets Fund and OFI Global China Fund LLC (collectively holding 17.88% of shares in Zee Entertainme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Sarpanch for Gross Negligence and Misconduct Under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act — Appellate Authority's Restoration Order Set Aside. The court held that failure to convene Gram Sabha meetings and misappropriation of funds constituted gross negligence and misconduct under Section 39 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959, and the appellate order was perverse.

10 Feb 2022

The case pertains to the removal of Respondent No.4, Radhakisan Laxman Mhetre, as Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Nalwandi, Beed, under Section 39 of th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Substitution of Penalty in CRPF Disciplinary Case Due to Abuse of Judicial Discretion and Statutory Non-Compliance. Judicial Review Under Article 226 Must Respect Statutory Mandate Under Section 11(1) of the Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 and Rule 27 of the Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955, with Punishment Commensurate to Misconduct Involving Violence and False Allegations.

11 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from disciplinary proceedings against a constable in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) who was charged with misconduct under R...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Hears Challenge to Disqualification Show Cause Notices Under Maharashtra Municipal Council Act. The court examined allegations of natural justice violation and constitutional autonomy of local bodies, but final decision is not available in the provided excerpt.

31 Oct 2018

The petitioners, nine municipal councillors and the vice president of Beed Municipal Council, filed a writ petition before the Aurangabad Bench of the...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions of APMC Members Challenging Government Circular on Term of Committee — Statutory Rule Under Rule 14(4) of KAPM(R&D) Rules, 1968 Prevails. The court held that the term of the committee continues until the first meeting of the newly constituted committee, and a government circular cannot override the statutory rule.

13 Jun 2016

The case involved a batch of writ petitions filed by members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) challenging a government c...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions of APMC Committee Members Challenging Government Circular Curtailing Term. Section 7(2) of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 mandates continuation of committee until newly elected committee assumes office, overriding executive instructions.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, challenged a Government Circular dated 22-04-2016 that purported to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Valuation of Physician's Free Samples Under Central Excise Act. Free samples of medicines are excisable goods and must be valued under Rule 4 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 based on price of comparable goods sold in the market.

28 Sep 2006

The petitioners, Indian Drugs Manufacturer's Association and M/s. Emil Pharmaceuticals Industries Pvt. Ltd., challenged Circular No. 813 dated 25/4/20...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)