Search Results for "remand extension order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "remand extension order"

277 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 277 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail in MPID Act Case Due to Non-Filing of Charge-Sheet Within 60 Days. Mere 'Seen' Remark on Application Under Section 316(5) BNS Does Not Constitute Valid Extension of Remand Under Section 187(3) BNSS.

7 Oct 2025

The petitioners, Ranganth Tulshiram Galande and Anil Zumbarrao Darekar, were arrested on 07.07.2025 in connection with Crime No. 673 of 2025 registere...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Accused in MPID Act Case Due to Non-Filing of Charge-Sheet Within 60 Days and Lack of Speaking Order for Remand Extension. The court held that the mere remark 'seen' on an application under Section 316(5) BNS does not satisfy the requirement of a reasoned order under Section 187(3) BNSS, entitling the accused to default bail.

7 Oct 2025

The petitioners, Ranganth Tulshiram Galande and Anil Zumbarrao Darekar, were arrested on 07.07.2025 in connection with Crime No. 673 of 2025 registere...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Disciplinary Proceedings for Violation of Natural Justice and Procedural Rules. The Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside punishment due to non-compliance with U.P. Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999, including failure to examine witnesses, supply documents, and seek extension of court-stipulated time.

23 Apr 2025

The appeal arose from a challenge by the State of Uttar Pradesh against a High Court order dismissing its writ petition, which had sought to overturn ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Accused in MCOCA Case Due to Refusal of Sanction and Filing of Charge-Sheet After Expiry of Investigation Period. The court held that the right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC is indefeasible and not defeated by subsequent filing of charge-sheet if the accused has already availed the right.

26 Mar 2024

The applicants, Dinesh Ganesh Indre and others, were arrested in connection with CR No. 497 of 2023 registered at Malad Police Station for offences un...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in UAPA Jurisdiction Case — Sessions Court Has Power to Add UAPA Offences When No Special Court Notified by State Government. The Court held that under Section 22(3) of the NIA Act, the Sessions Court is the exclusive trial court for UAPA offences when no Special Court is constituted by the State Government, and the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate retains remand jurisdiction.

1 Jan 2024

The State of West Bengal appealed against the Calcutta High Court's order quashing proceedings under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (U...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Default Bail in UAPA Case: Exclusive Jurisdiction of Special Court for Extension of Investigation Period. The right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC accrues upon expiry of 90 days and is not defeated by subsequent filing of charge sheet if application was made before filing.

30 Oct 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Bikramjit Singh, who was arrested in connection with a grenade attack at a Nirankari Bhawan in Amritsar on 18....

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Robbery Case Under Section 392 IPC. Identification by Witnesses and Recovery of Stolen Property Sufficient to Sustain Conviction.

7 Feb 2019

The judgment concerns two criminal appeals arising from a common conviction under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code for robbery. The appellants, Sh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Robbery Under Section 392 IPC. Identification by Witnesses and Recovery of Stolen Property Sufficient to Sustain Conviction.

7 Feb 2019

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of conviction dated 24.3.2004 passed by the 1st Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against MIDC for Unilateral Rescission of Land Allotment — MIDC's Action Held Arbitrary and Violative of Natural Justice. Concluded Contract Exists Upon Acceptance of Consideration, Entitling Petitioner to Specific Performance.

30 Nov 2017

The petitioners, Kamlakar Bhimrao Patil and Terrafirm Softtech Private Limited (formerly Everest Realtors Pvt. Ltd.), filed a writ petition under Arti...

High Court

High Court Sets Aside Remand Order in Specific Performance Suit — District Judge Exceeded Powers Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC by Remanding Suit Without Deciding Pending Applications. The Court Held That Remand Is Permissible Only When Decree Is Reversed and Retrial Is Necessary, Not When Appellate Court Has Not Decided Pending Interlocutory Applications.

10 Jul 2017

The appellant, Mahadeo Ramchandra Chikate, filed Special Civil Suit No.31/2007 for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 15.07.2006 conce...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)