Search Results for "regular summons"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "regular summons"

798 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 798 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Partition Suit Due to Non-Service of Summons on Defendants, Remands Matter for Fresh Trial. Ex-parte decree set aside as trial court failed to ensure proper service, violating principles of natural justice under Section 96 CPC.

12 Mar 2024

The appellants, who were defendants 1 to 6 in the original suit, filed this appeal under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Pro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Ex-Parte Decree in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Failure to Serve Summons and Lack of Proper Address Renders Decree Nullity. The court held that an ex-parte decree passed without proper service of summons is a nullity and can be set aside in writ jurisdiction despite alternative remedy under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC.

23 Apr 2014

The petitioners, Narendra Pandurang Chatim and Vandana Narendra Chatim, filed two writ petitions (Writ Petition Nos. 61 and 62 of 2014) before the Bom...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Chamber Summons to Set Aside Abatement of Arbitration Petition and Condonation of Delay. Application Filed Under Order 22 Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to Bring Legal Representatives of Deceased Parties on Record.

15 Feb 2013

The Chamber Summons was filed under Order 22 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to set aside the abatement of Arbitration Petition N...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Civil Suit Over Ex Parte Decree and Demolition Order, Remands for Fresh Adjudication. The court held that a defendant appealing under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, without filing an application under Order IX Rule 13, can challenge the ex parte decree on grounds of improper service of summons or illegality of ex parte proceedings based on the suit record, as per Section 105.

6 Sep 2022

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by the first respondent-plaintiff in the City Civil Court at Bangalore, seeking a declaration of ownership o...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Builders' Challenge to Provident Fund Coverage of Casual Construction Workers. Para 26(2) Amendment to Provident Fund Scheme Removes Waiting Period, Requiring Membership from Date of Joining.

28 Feb 2006

Three writ petitions were filed by builders—Sandeep Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. R.B. Constructions, and Builders Association of India with its members�...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Criminal Petition Against Orders Directing Regular Bail Despite Subsisting Anticipatory Bail. Held That Filing of Charge-Sheet Does Not Terminate Anticipatory Bail; Accused Need Not Apply for Regular Bail Unless Bail Order Limits Duration, per Sushila Aggarwal v. State.

23 Jun 2026

The petitioners, accused of offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Dowry Prohibition Act in Crime No. 115/2025, were granted anticipatory ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Non-Bailable Warrant in Criminal Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 73 Cr.P.C. — Petitioner's Absence Not Deliberate as Warrant Issued Without Prior Notice or Bailable Warrant. The court held that a non-bailable warrant cannot be issued without first issuing a bailable warrant or summons unless there is deliberate avoidance, and the Sessions Court failed to record reasons as required under Section 73 Cr.P.C.

9 Jul 2024

The petitioner, Vaibhavaraj Utsav, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. before the High Court of Karnataka challenging an order dated 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Decree in Civil Suit — Appellants Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance in Appeal. The court held that the burden of proving sufficient cause under Order XLI Rule 21 CPC was not discharged, as the explanation for non-appearance was vague and the bailiff report indicated proper service on an adult family member.

5 Mar 2013

The case arises from a civil suit (Regular Civil Suit No.47 of 2001) filed by the respondent (original plaintiff) against the appellants (original def...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Decree in Civil Suit for Possession — Order IX Rule 13 CPC Application Held Maintainable Despite Decree Under Order VIII Rule 5(2) or Rule 10. The Court held that an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC is maintainable to set aside an ex parte decree passed under Order VIII Rule 5(2) or Rule 10 CPC, as the decree is still ex parte and the defendant can show sufficient cause for non-appearance.

10 Aug 2005

The case arises from Regular Civil Suit No.52 of 1992 filed by the respondent (plaintiff) against the petitioners (defendants) for possession of suit ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Summons for Judgment in Summary Suit for Recovery of Project Management Fees. Agreement for Development of Property by Family Members Not a Commercial Transaction Entitling Summary Procedure Under Order 37 CPC.

19 Jul 2011

The plaintiff, Satchi Development Company Pvt. Ltd., filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for recovery of ₹3,70...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)